Argumentation May 2013

Ad Hominem Fallacies, Bias, and Testimony

Audrey Yap University of Victoria
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2013-05-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-011-9260-5
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Hundleby (2023)
    Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias
    Argumentation
  2. Boudry et al. (2015)
    The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life
    Argumentation

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Eemeren et al. (2006)
    Strategic Maneuvering: A Synthetic Recapitulation
    Argumentation
  2. Eemeren et al. (1992)
    Relevance reviewed: The case of argumentum ad hominem
    Argumentation
Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓
  1. M. Bertrand (2004)
    Bertrand, M., and S. Mullainathan. 2004. Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field e…
    American Economic Review  ↗
  2. R. Steinpreis (1999)
    Steinpreis, R., K. Anders, and D. Ritzke. 1999. The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of …
    Sex Roles  ↗
  3. F. Eemeren van (2009)
    Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness, volume 16 of argumentation library, chapter 3
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 19 View in citation network → Build reading path →