Argumentation Sep 1987

Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective

Frans H. Van Eemeren ; Rob Grootendorst University of Amsterdam
Journal
Argumentation
Published
1987-09-01
DOI
10.1007/bf00136779
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (27)

  1. Vellinga (2025)
    Something We All Accept: Sincerity Conditions in Argumentation by Fiction
    Argumentation
  2. Duarte (2024)
    Epidemiology of Fallacies
    Argumentation
  3. Aspeitia (2020)
    Whataboutisms and Inconsistency
    Argumentation
  4. Orkibi (2018)
    Precedential Ad Hominem in Polemical Exchange: Examples from the Israeli Politi…
    Argumentation
  5. Poucke (2018)
    The Conjunction of a French Rhetoric of Unity with a Competing Nationalism in N…
    Argumentation
Show all 27 →
  1. Boudry et al. (2015)
    The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life
    Argumentation
  2. Koszowy et al. (2014)
    The Lvov–Warsaw School as a Source of Inspiration for Argumentation Theory
    Argumentation
  3. Lewiński (2011)
    Towards a Critique-Friendly Approach to the Straw Man Fallacy Evaluation
    Argumentation
  4. Botting (2011)
    Can ‘Big’ Questions be Begged?
    Argumentation
  5. Talisse et al. (2006)
    Two Forms of the Straw Man
    Argumentation
  6. Kimball (2006)
    What’s Wrong with Argumentum ad Baculum? Reasons, Threats, and Logical Norms
    Argumentation
  7. Bertea (2005)
    Does Arguing from Coherence Make Sense?
    Argumentation
  8. Walton (2005)
    Begging the Question in Arguments Based on Testimony
    Argumentation
  9. Ikuenobe (2004)
    On the Theoretical Unification and Nature of Fallacies
    Argumentation
  10. Ikeunobe (2002)
    In Search of Criteria for ‘Fallacies’ and ‘Begging the Question’
    Argumentation
  11. Chichi (2002)
    The Greek Roots of the Ad Hominem-Argument
    Argumentation
  12. Slob (2002)
    How to Distinguish Good and Bad Arguments: Dialogico-Rhetorical Normativity
    Argumentation
  13. Cascio (2000)
    Cattani, Adelino (1995). Discorsi Ingannevoli: argomenti per difendersi, attacc…
    Argumentation
  14. Walton (1999)
    The Appeal to Ignorance, or Argumentum Ad Ignorantiam
    Argumentation
  15. Woods (1998)
    Argumentum ad baculum
    Argumentation
  16. TINDALE (1997)
    Fallacies, Blunders, and Dialogue Shifts: Walton‘s Contributions to the Fallacy…
    Argumentation
  17. Mackenzie (1994)
    Contexts of Begging the Question
    Argumentation
  18. Levi (1994)
    Begging what is at issue in the argument
    Argumentation
  19. Ilatov (1993)
    Manipulations in argumentation
    Argumentation
  20. Eemeren et al. (1992)
    Relevance reviewed: The case of argumentum ad hominem
    Argumentation
  21. Krabbe (1992)
    So what? Profiles for relevance criticism in persuation dialogues
    Argumentation
  22. Eemeren et al. (1988)
    Rules for argumentation in dialogues
    Argumentation

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 4 works outside this index ↓
  1. E. M. Barth (1982)
    From Axiom to Dialogue. A Philosophical Study of Logic and Argumentation
     ↗
  2. Frans H. Eemeren van (1986)
    Eemeren, Frans H. van: 1986a, ?Dialectical Analysis as a Normative Reconstruction of Argumentative Discourse?…
    Text  ↗
  3. Frans H. Eemeren van (1984)
    Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discuss…
     ↗
  4. F. H. Eemeren van (1987)
    Handbook of Argumentation Theory. A Critical Survey of Classical Backgrounds and Modern Studies
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 101 View in citation network → Build reading path →