Abstract

Abstract In contemporary literature on argumentation, it is well-established that various genres of fiction can be used to present argumentation. For instance, in political satires, authors argue why a certain political situation is undesirable. Similarly, authors of fables argue—by means of animals as characters—that certain behaviour is desirable or unacceptable. Characteristically, authors of fiction create a fictional world in which their narratives take place. This collides with the sincerity conditions of the speech act complex of argumentation: preliminary conditions that should be satisfied for argumentation to be performed correctly. Firstly, these sincerity conditions require the arguer to believe that their standpoint is acceptable. Second, the arguer should believe that the statements they make to justify their standpoint are acceptable and third, the arguer should believe that these statements constitute an acceptable justification of their standpoint. As such, when argumentation meets fiction, the sincerity conditions do not align: how can authors—as arguers—actually believe that their uttered statements are acceptable, if these statements are oftentimes not true? The aim of this paper is to show both how proponents can accept propositions in fiction while still following argumentation’s sincerity conditions.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-025-09661-4
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (51) · 1 in this index

  1. Fiction: A philosophical analysis
  2. Appel, M. 2008. Fictional narratives cultivate just-world beliefs. Journal of Communication 58:62–83.
    Journal of Communication  
  3. Bergman, K. G., and N. Franszén. 2022. The force of fictional discourse. Synthese 6 (200): 474.
    Synthese  
  4. Giving reasons: A linguistic-pragmatic approach to argumentation theory
  5. Impossible worlds
Show all 51 →
  1. Collins, R. L., M. N. Elliot, S. H. Berry, D. E. Kanouse, and S. B. Hunter. 2003. Entertainment television as…
    Pediatrics  
  2. The nature of fiction
  3. The Routledge handbook of fiction and belief
  4. Davies, D. 1996. Fictional truth and fictional authors. British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (1): 43–55.
    British Journal of Aesthetics  
  5. Dixon, D. 2022. Lies in art. Australian Journal of Philosophy 100 (1): 25–39.
    Australian Journal of Philosophy  
  6. Dixon, D. 2022. Novel assertions: A reply to Mahon. British Journal of Aethetics 62 (1): 115–124.
    British Journal of Aethetics
  7. Friend, S. 2012. Fiction as a genre. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (2): 179–209.
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society  
  8. Friend, S. 2017. The real foundation of fictional worlds. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (1): 29–42.
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy  
  9. García-Carpintero, M. 2019. Assertions in fictions: An indirect speech act account. Grazer Philosophische Stu…
    Grazer Philosophische Studien  
  10. Narrative discourse
  11. Green, M. 2010. How and what we can learn from fiction. In A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature, 350–366.
  12. Green, M. 2022. Fiction and epistemic value: State of the art. British Journal of Aesthetics 62 (2): 273–289.
    British Journal of Aesthetics  
  13. Ingarden, R. 1973. The Literary Work of Art: An investigation on the borderlines of ontology, logic, and theo…
  14. The implied reader: Patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Beckett
  15. Logical self-defense
  16. Truth, fiction, and literature: A philosophical perspective
  17. Mahon, J. E. 2019. Novels never lie. British Journal of Aethetics 59 (3): 323–338.
    British Journal of Aethetics
  18. Marsh, E. J., and L. K. Fazio. 2006. Learning errors from fiction: Difficulties in reducing reliance on ficti…
    Memory and Cognition  
  19. Marsili, N. 2023. Fictions that purport to tell the truth. The Philosophical Quarterly 73 (2): 510–531.
    The Philosophical Quarterly  
  20. Marsili, N. 2024. Fictions that don’t tell the truth. Philosophical Studies 181 (5): 1025–1046.
    Philosophical Studies  
  21. Moyer-Gusé, E., and R. L. Nabi. 2010. Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television prog…
    Human Communication Research  
  22. Ohmann, R. 1971. Speech acts and the definition of literature. Philosophy & Rhetoric 4 (1): 1–19.
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  23. Systematic approaches to argument by analogy
  24. Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory
  25. Olmos, P. 2017a. Narration as argument, vol. 31. Berlin: Springer.
  26. Olmos, P. 2017b. On thought experiments and other narratives in scientific argument. In Narration as argument…
  27. Plumer, G. 2015. On novels as arguments. Informal Logic 35 (4): 488–507.
    Informal Logic  
  28. Popa, E.O. 2016. Thought experiments in academic communication: A pragmadialectical method for reconstructing…
  29. Russell, B. 1954. An inquiry into meaning and truth (7th impr.). Bishop and Sons Limited.
  30. Schaper, E. 1978. Fiction and the suspension of disbelief. The British Journal of Aesthetics 18 (1): 31–44.
    The British Journal of Aesthetics  
  31. Searle, J. R. 1975. The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History 6 (2): 319–332.
    New Literary History  
  32. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts
  33. Searle, J. R. 1980. Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 3 (3): 417–457.
    Behavioural and Brain Sciences  
  34. Making the social world: The structure of human civilization
  35. Sierra-Catalán, G. 2021. Argumentation and fiction: Types of overlaps and their functions. Informal Logic 41 …
    Informal Logic
  36. Sorensen, R. 2017. Lucifer’s logic lesson: How to lie with arguments. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society…
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary  
  37. Introduction to logical theory
  38. The fables of Aesop
  39. Unger, J. B., G. B. Molina, and M. Baron. 2009. Evaluation of Sweet Temptations, a fotonovela for diabetes ed…
    Hispanic Health Care International  
  40. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory…
  41. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discuss…
  42. Argumentation
  43. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach
  44. Argumentative indicators in discourse
  45. Walton, K. L. 1973. Pictures and make-believe. The Philosophical Review 82 (3): 283–319.
    The Philosophical Review  
  46. Walton, K. L. 1980. Appreciating fiction: Suspending disbelief or pretending belief? Dispositio 5 (13–14): 1–18.
    Dispositio