Abstract

Abstract In contemporary literature on argumentation, it is well-established that various genres of fiction can be used to present argumentation. For instance, in political satires, authors argue why a certain political situation is undesirable. Similarly, authors of fables argue—by means of animals as characters—that certain behaviour is desirable or unacceptable. Characteristically, authors of fiction create a fictional world in which their narratives take place. This collides with the sincerity conditions of the speech act complex of argumentation: preliminary conditions that should be satisfied for argumentation to be performed correctly. Firstly, these sincerity conditions require the arguer to believe that their standpoint is acceptable. Second, the arguer should believe that the statements they make to justify their standpoint are acceptable and third, the arguer should believe that these statements constitute an acceptable justification of their standpoint. As such, when argumentation meets fiction, the sincerity conditions do not align: how can authors—as arguers—actually believe that their uttered statements are acceptable, if these statements are oftentimes not true? The aim of this paper is to show both how proponents can accept propositions in fiction while still following argumentation’s sincerity conditions.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-025-09661-4
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation
Also cites 34 works outside this index ↓
  1. Fiction: A philosophical analysis
  2. Appel, M. 2008. Fictional narratives cultivate just-world beliefs. Journal of Communication 58:62–83.
    Journal of Communication  
  3. Bergman, K. G., and N. Franszén. 2022. The force of fictional discourse. Synthese 6 (200): 474.
    Synthese  
  4. Giving reasons: A linguistic-pragmatic approach to argumentation theory
  5. Impossible worlds
  6. Collins, R. L., M. N. Elliot, S. H. Berry, D. E. Kanouse, and S. B. Hunter. 2003. Entertainment television as…
    Pediatrics  
  7. The nature of fiction
  8. The Routledge handbook of fiction and belief
  9. Davies, D. 1996. Fictional truth and fictional authors. British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (1): 43–55.
    British Journal of Aesthetics  
  10. Dixon, D. 2022. Lies in art. Australian Journal of Philosophy 100 (1): 25–39.
    Australian Journal of Philosophy  
  11. Friend, S. 2012. Fiction as a genre. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (2): 179–209.
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society  
  12. Friend, S. 2017. The real foundation of fictional worlds. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (1): 29–42.
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy  
  13. García-Carpintero, M. 2019. Assertions in fictions: An indirect speech act account. Grazer Philosophische Stu…
    Grazer Philosophische Studien  
  14. Green, M. 2010. How and what we can learn from fiction. In A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature, 350–366.
  15. Green, M. 2022. Fiction and epistemic value: State of the art. British Journal of Aesthetics 62 (2): 273–289.
    British Journal of Aesthetics  
  16. Marsh, E. J., and L. K. Fazio. 2006. Learning errors from fiction: Difficulties in reducing reliance on ficti…
    Memory and Cognition  
  17. Marsili, N. 2023. Fictions that purport to tell the truth. The Philosophical Quarterly 73 (2): 510–531.
    The Philosophical Quarterly  
  18. Marsili, N. 2024. Fictions that don’t tell the truth. Philosophical Studies 181 (5): 1025–1046.
    Philosophical Studies  
  19. Moyer-Gusé, E., and R. L. Nabi. 2010. Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television prog…
    Human Communication Research  
  20. Systematic approaches to argument by analogy
  21. Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory
  22. Olmos, P. 2017a. Narration as argument, vol. 31. Berlin: Springer.
  23. Plumer, G. 2015. On novels as arguments. Informal Logic 35 (4): 488–507.
    Informal Logic  
  24. Schaper, E. 1978. Fiction and the suspension of disbelief. The British Journal of Aesthetics 18 (1): 31–44.
    The British Journal of Aesthetics  
  25. Searle, J. R. 1975. The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History 6 (2): 319–332.
    New Literary History  
  26. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts
  27. Searle, J. R. 1980. Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 3 (3): 417–457.
    Behavioural and Brain Sciences  
  28. Making the social world: The structure of human civilization
  29. Sorensen, R. 2017. Lucifer’s logic lesson: How to lie with arguments. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society…
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary  
  30. Unger, J. B., G. B. Molina, and M. Baron. 2009. Evaluation of Sweet Temptations, a fotonovela for diabetes ed…
    Hispanic Health Care International  
  31. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory…
  32. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discuss…
  33. Argumentative indicators in discourse
  34. Walton, K. L. 1973. Pictures and make-believe. The Philosophical Review 82 (3): 283–319.
    The Philosophical Review