Argumentation Dec 2019 Open Access

Presumptions, and How They Relate to Arguments from Ignorance

Petar Bodlović University of Groningen

Abstract

AbstractBy explaining the argument from ignorance in terms of thepresumption of innocence, many textbooks in argumentation theory suggest that some arguments from ignorance might share essential features with some types of presumptive reasoning. The stronger version of this view, suggesting that arguments from ignorance and presumptive reasoning are almost indistinguishable, is occasionally proposed by Douglas Walton. This paper explores the nature and limits of the stronger proposal and argues that initial presumptions and arguments from ignorance arenotclosely connected. There are three main reasons. First, the argument from ignorance, unlike typical presumptive reasoning, is a negative kind of inference. Second, the typical initial presumption is sensitive to a broader set of defeaters and thus assumes a higher (negative) standard of acceptability. Third, in dialectical terms, initial presumption and argument from ignorance bring different attacking rights and obligations. I conclude that Waltonian intuition is unsupported or, at best, is limited only to practical presumptions and practical arguments from ignorance.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2019-12-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-019-09498-8
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
argument
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Bodlović (2021)
    On the Differences Between Practical and Cognitive Presumptions
    Argumentation

Cites in this index (10)

  1. Bodlović (2017)
    Dialogical Features of Presumptions: Difficulties for Walton’s New Dialogical Theory
    Argumentation
  2. Gama (2017)
    The Nature and the Place of Presumptions in Law and Legal Argumentation
    Argumentation
  3. Godden (2017)
    Presumption as a Modal Qualifier: Presumption, Inference, and Managing Epistemic Risk
    Argumentation
  4. Lewiński (2017)
    Argumentation Theory Without Presumptions
    Argumentation
  5. Plumer (2017)
    Presumptions, Assumptions, and Presuppositions of Ordinary Arguments
    Argumentation
Show all 10 →
  1. Rhode (2017)
    The Burden of Proof in Philosophical Persuasion Dialogue
    Argumentation
  2. Aijaz et al. (2013)
    Burdens of Proof and the Case for Unevenness
    Argumentation
  3. Laar et al. (2013)
    The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance
    Argumentation
  4. Hahn et al. (2007)
    The Burden of Proof and Its Role in Argumentation
    Argumentation
  5. Kauffeld (1998)
    Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing…
    Argumentation
Also cites 23 works outside this index ↓
  1. L Bermejo-Luque (2016)
    Bermejo-Luque, L. 2016. Being a Correct Presumption Vs. Being Presumably the Case. Informal Logic 36 (1): 1–25.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  2. IM Copi (2016)
    Introduction to Logic
     ↗
  3. L Cummings (2002)
    Cummings, L. 2002. Reasoning Under Uncertainty: The Role of Two Informal Fallacies in an Emerging Scientific …
    Informal Logic  ↗
  4. D Godden (2007)
    Godden, D., and D. Walton. 2007. A Theory of Presumption for Everyday Argumentation. Pragmatics & Cognition 1…
    Pragmatics & Cognition  ↗
  5. F Kauffeld (2003)
    Anyone Who has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation
     ↗
  6. F Macagno (2011)
    Macagno, F., and D. Walton. 2011. Reasoning from Paradigms and Negative Evidence. Pragmatics & Cognition 19 (…
    Pragmatics & Cognition  ↗
  7. F Macagno (2012)
    Macagno, F., and D. Walton. 2012. Presumptions in Legal Argumentation. Ratio Juris 25 (3): 271–300.
    Ratio Juris  ↗
  8. Pinto, R.C. 2001. Argument, Inference and Dialectic: Collected Papers on Informal Logic (with an introduction…
     ↗
  9. JL Pollock (1987)
    Pollock, J.L. 1987. Defeasible Reasoning. Cognitive Science 11: 481–518.
    Cognitive Science  ↗
  10. N Rescher (2006)
    Presumption and the Practices of Tentative Cognition
     ↗
  11. M Rescorla (2009)
    Rescorla, M. 2009. Shifting the Burden of Proof? Philosophical Quarterly 59 (234): 86–109.
    Philosophical Quarterly  ↗
  12. TD Senor (1996)
    Senor, T.D. 1996. The Prima/Ultima Facie Justification Distinction in Epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenol…
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  ↗
  13. CW Tindale (2007)
    Fallacies and Argument Appraisal
     ↗
  14. G Tuzet (2015)
    Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation
     ↗
  15. E Ullmann-Margalit (1983)
    Ullmann-Margalit, E. 1983. On Presumption. Journal of Philosophy 80 (3): 143–163.
    Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  16. FH van Eeemeren (2009)
    Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness
     ↗
  17. D Walton (1993)
    Walton, D. 1993. The Speech Act of Presumption. Pragmatics & Cognition 1 (1): 125–148.
    Pragmatics & Cognition  ↗
  18. D Walton (2001)
    Walton, D. 2001. Abductive, Presumptive and Plausible Arguments. Informal Logic 21 (2): 141–169.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  19. D Walton (2008)
    Walton, D. 2008b. A Dialogical Theory of Presumption. Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (2): 209–243.
    Artificial Intelligence and Law  ↗
  20. D Walton (2014)
    Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation
     ↗
  21. D Walton (2008)
    Argumentation Schemes
     ↗
  22. J Woods (1978)
    Woods, J., and D. Walton. 1978. The Fallacy of ‘Ad Ignorantiam’. Dialectica 32 (2): 87–99.
    Dialectica  ↗
  23. M Wreen (1989)
    Wreen, M. 1989. Light from Darkness, from Ignorance Knowledge. Dialectica 43 (4): 299–314.
    Dialectica  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Res Rhetorica Apr 2026
    Logos in ancient Greek discourse on rhetoric: An overview ↗
    Arkadiusz Sokolnicki
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  2. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    Associations of adolescents’ argumentative writing scores and growth when evaluated by different human raters and artificial intelligence models ↗
    Deborah K. Reed; Sterett Mercer
    argument artificial intelligence
  3. Rhetoric of Health and Medicine Apr 2026
    Psyche or Soma? ↗
    Samantha Rippetoe
    rhetorical criticism argument archival research
  4. Argumentation Mar 2026
    The Recursive Argument Structure Reconsidered ↗
    Shiyang Yu
    argument
  5. Argumentation Mar 2026
    Between Rationality and Self-protection: Student-Constructed Arguments on Fast Food Consumption and Antibiotic Overuse as Public Health Issues in Biology Education ↗
    Eliza Rybska; Michał Klichowski; Costas P. Constantinou; Barbara Jankowiak
    writing pedagogy teacher development argument qualitative research