The Burden of Proof and Its Role in Argumentation

Ulrike Hahn Cardiff University ; Mike Oaksford Birkbeck, University of London
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2007-09-17
DOI
10.1007/s10503-007-9022-6
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
Also cites 14 works outside this index ↓
  1. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discourse. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussio…
  2. Anyone Who Has a View
  3. Hahn U., Oaksford M. (2006). A Bayesian Approach to Informal Reasoning Fallacies. Synthese, 152:207–223
    Synthese  
  4. Hahn, U. and M. Oaksford: (in press), ‹The Rationality of Informal Argumentation: A␣Bayesian Approach to Reas…
  5. Kauffeld, F. J.: 2002, ‹Pivotal Issues and Norms in Rhetorical Theories of Argumentation’, in F. H. van Eemer…
  6. Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation
  7. Kokott, J.: 1998. The Burden of Proof in Comparative and International Human Rights Law: Civil and Common Law…
  8. Korb K. (2004). Bayesian Informal Logic and Fallacy. Informal Logic, 24:41–70
    Informal Logic  
  9. Oaksford M., Hahn U. (2004). A Bayesian Approach to the Argument from Ignorance. Canadian Journal of Experime…
    Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology  
  10. Prakken, H., C. Reed and D. Walton: 2005, ‹Dialogues about the Burden of Proof’, Proceeding of the Tenth Inte…
  11. Toulmin, S.: 1958, The Uses of Argument, (revised edition 2003). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  12. Ullman-Margalit E. (1983). On Presumption. The Journal of Philosophy, 80:143–163
    The Journal of Philosophy  
  13. The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument
  14. Walton D. (2003). Is there a Burden of Questioning? Artificial Intelligence and Law, 11:1–43
    Artificial Intelligence and Law