Journal
Argumentation
Published
2017-09-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-017-9422-1
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
Also cites 17 works outside this index ↓
  1. Bermejo-Luque, L. 2016. Being a correct presumption vs. being presumably the case. Informal Logic 36: 1–25.
    Informal Logic  
  2. Campolo, C. 2005. Treacherous ascents: On seeking common ground for conflict resolution. Informal Logic 25: 37–50.
    Informal Logic  
  3. Dare, T., and J. Kingsbury. 2008. Putting the burden of proof in its place: When are differential allocations…
    Southern Journal of Philosophy  
  4. Godden, D. 2010. The importance of belief in argumentation: belief, commitment and the effective resolution o…
    Synthese  
  5. Godden, D., and D. Walton. 2007. A theory of presumption for everyday argumentation. Pragmatics & Cognition 1…
    Pragmatics & Cognition  
  6. Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation
  7. Truth, error and criminal law
  8. Macagno, F., and D. Walton. 2012. Presumptions in legal argumentation. Ratio Juris 25: 271–300.
    Ratio Juris  
  9. Argument, inference and dialectic: collected papers on informal logic with an introductio…
  10. Prakken, H. 2004. Analysing reasoning about evidence with formal models of argumentation. Law, Probability & …
    Law, Probability & Risk  
  11. Presumption and the practices of tentative cognition
  12. Stalnaker, R. [1974] 1999. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Context and content: Essays on intentionality in spe…
  13. Toulmin, S. [1958] 2003. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  14. Ullmann-Margalit, E. 1983. On presumption. Journal of Philosophy 80: 143–163.
    Journal of Philosophy  
  15. Walton, D. 1993. The speech act of presumption. Pragmatics & Cognition 1: 125–148.
    Pragmatics & Cognition  
  16. Walton, D. 2008. A dialogical theory of presumption. Artificial Intelligence and Law 16: 209–243.
    Artificial Intelligence and Law  
  17. Burden of proof, presumption and argumentation