Argumentation Theory Without Presumptions

Marcin Lewiński Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2017-09-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-017-9421-2
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

References (49) · 5 in this index

  1. Allen, R.J. 1981. Presumptions in civil actions reconsidered. Iowa Law Review 66: 843–867.
    Iowa Law Review
  2. Topics. Books I and VIII (trans., intr., and notes by R. Smith)
  3. Bermejo-Luque, L. 2016. Being a correct presumption vs being presumably the case. Informal Logic 36 (1): 1–25.
    Informal Logic  
  4. Bickenbach, J.E. 1990. The “Artificial Reason” of the law. Informal Logic 12: 23–32.
    Informal Logic  
  5. Davidson, D. 1973. Radical interpretation. Dialectica 27 (3–4): 313–328.
    Dialectica  
Show all 49 →
  1. Davidson, D. 1974. On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philoso…
    Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association  
  2. Davidson, D. 1994. Radical interpretation interpreted. Philosophical Perspectives Logic and Language 8: 121–128.
    Philosophical Perspectives Logic and Language  
  3. Dennett, D.C. 1971. Intentional systems. The Journal of Philosophy 68 (4): 87–106.
    The Journal of Philosophy  
  4. Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation
  5. Fenner, G.M. 1992. Presumptions: 350 years of confusion and it has come to this. Creighton Law Review 25: 383–422.
    Creighton Law Review
  6. Fine, A. 1993. Fictionalism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy XVIII: 1–18.
    Midwest Studies Philosophy  
  7. On bullshit
  8. Acceptable premises: An epistemic approach to an informal logic problem
  9. McCarthyism, the great American Red Scare: A documentary history
  10. Fuller, L. L. 1967. Legal fictions. Stanford: Stanford University Press. [Originally published as three artic…
  11. Godden, D. forth. Presumption as a modal qualifier: Presumption, inference, and managing epistemic risk, Argu…
  12. Godden, D., and D. Walton. 2007. A theory of presumption for everyday argumentation. Pragmatics and Cognition…
    Pragmatics and Cognition  
  13. Syntax and semantics
    Speech acts
  14. Studies in the way of words
  15. Hansen, H. V. 2003. Theories of presumptions and burdens of proof. In Informal Logic at 25: Proceedings of th…
  16. Jackson, S. 1995. Fallacies and heuristics. In Analysis and Evaluation. Proceedings of the Third ISSA Confere…
  17. Jackson, S., and S. Jacobs. 1980. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Qu…
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  18. Argumentation
  19. Pragmatics
  20. Lewiński, M. 2012. The paradox of charity. Informal Logic 32 (4): 403–439.
    The paradox of charity. Informal Logic  
  21. International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy
  22. Argumentation
  23. Kauffeld, F. J. 2003. The ordinary practice of presuming and presumption with special attention to veracity a…
  24. Argument Cultures: Proceedings of OSSA 09, CD-ROM
  25. Kauffeld, F. J. 2013. The epistemic relevance of social considerations in ordinary day-to-day presumptions. I…
  26. Argumentation
  27. Argumentation
  28. Word and object
  29. Presumption and the practices of tentative cognition
  30. Argumentation
  31. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language
  32. Language, mind, and knowledge
  33. Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind
  34. (On) Searle on conversation
  35. The construction of social reality
  36. Making the social world: The structure of human civilization
  37. Semantics and philosophy
  38. Stalnaker, R. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5–6): 701–721.
    Linguistics and Philosophy  
  39. Statutory Solutions of the Problem of Survival in a Common Disaster. 1936. Harvard Law Review 50 (2): 344–349.
  40. The uses of argument (2nd edition 2003)
  41. Ullmann-Margalit, E. 1983. On presumptions. The Journal of Philosophy 80 (3): 143–163.
    The Journal of Philosophy  
  42. Walton, D. 2002. Are some modus ponens arguments deductively invalid? Informal Logic 22 (1): 19–46.
    Informal Logic
  43. Burden of proof, presumption and argumentation
  44. Argumentation schemes