Rhetoric Society Quarterly Mar 2023

Postracial Presumptions: The Supreme Court’s Undoing of the Voting Rights Act through Racial Ignorance

Chris S. Earle

Abstract

To warrant the weakening of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority has actively manufactured ignorance of racism in the realm of voting. Through an analysis of majority opinions in Shelby County v. Holder (2013), Abbott v. Perez (2018), and cases concerning states’ antivoting fraud restrictions, I demonstrate how considerable evidence of racial discrimination is deemed to fail the standard of proof imposed by the court. I offer the term postracial presumption to account for how dominant publics are empowered to reason as if the United States was beyond race, to employ postracial premises to warrant judgments for which there is insufficient evidence and, indeed, for which there is considerable disconfirming evidence. The essay demonstrates how presumption and proof burdens can be critical tools in the study of postracism and is suggestive of how racial ignorance cannot simply be rectified by more proof.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2023-03-15
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2022.2129764
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
race and writing
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (67) · 2 in this index

  1. Abbott v. Perez. 585 U.S. 2018.
  2. Alcoff Linda Martín (2007)
    Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance
  3. Ansolabehere Stephen (2008)
    Harvard Law Review
  4. 10.1080/00335630.2017.1360507
     ↗
  5. Berman Ari (2015)
    Give us the Ballot: The Modern Struggle for Voting Rights in America
Show all 67 →
  1. Brennan Center.Voting Laws Roundup: May 2021. 28 May 2021. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-re…
  2. 10.1515/9780271081335
     ↗
  3. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee. 594 U.S. 2021.
  4. Bullock Charles S., III (2016)
    The Rise and Fall of the Voting Rights Act
  5. Chemerinsky Erwin (2016)
    Pierce Law Review
  6. 10.1080/17513057.2015.1025328
     ↗
  7. City of Boerne v. Flores. 521 U.S. 507 1997.
  8. Crawford v. Marion County. 553 US 2008. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/553/181/#tab-opinion-1962669.
  9. Crosswhite James (2019)
    Presumptions and Burdens of Proof: An Anthology of Argumentation and the Law
  10. 10.1080/10511431.2021.1965303
     ↗
  11. Fleming Chrystal M (2018)
    How to Be Less Stupid about Race
  12. 10.1080/14791420600841351
     ↗
  13. 10.1080/10570319409374482
     ↗
  14. Gaskins Richard. H (1993)
    Burdens of Proof in Modern Discourse
  15. 10.1002/cne.10717
     ↗
  16. Gill v. Whitford. 585 U.S. 2018
  17. Ginsburg, Ruther Bader. “Dissenting Opinion.”Shelby County v. Holder. 570 U.S. 2013.
  18. 10.1002/9781444304695
     ↗
  19. Goodnight Thomas G (2019)
    Presumptions and Burdens of Proof: An Anthology of Argumentation and the Law
  20. Greenhouse, Linda. “The Supreme Court Is Not Finished with Elections.”New York Times, 25 Feb. 2021. https://w…
  21. Hasen Richard L (2020)
    Election Meltdown: Dirty Tricks, Distrust, and the Threat of American Democracy
  22. Hasen Richard L (2020)
    The Georgetown Law Journal Online
  23. Hasen Richard L (2012)
    The Voting Wars: From Florida 2000 to the Next Election Meltdown
  24. 10.1080/00335630.2018.1486035
     ↗
  25. Hulse, Carl. “Republicans Block a Second Voting Rights Bill in the Senate.”New York Times, 3 Nov. 2021, https…
  26. Jackson (2010)
    Whatever Happened to the Cephalic Index? The Reality of Race and the Burden of Proof
    Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  27. 10.1080/14791420.2010.523431
     ↗
  28. Kagan, Elena. “Dissenting Opinion.”Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee. 594 U.S. (2021)
  29. 10.1111/socf.12576
     ↗
  30. 10.4000/transatlantica.7462
     ↗
  31. Kousser Morgan (2008)
    Texas Law Review
  32. Landsberg Brian (2007)
    Free at Last to Vote: The Alabama Origins of the 1965 Voting Rights Act
  33. Lewiński (2017)
    Argumentation Theory Without Presumptions
    Argumentation
  34. 10.5406/illinois/9780252040450.001.0001
     ↗
  35. 10.1017/S0033291700033432
     ↗
  36. Mills Charles W (1997)
    The Racial Contract
  37. Mills Charles W (2007)
    Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance
  38. Minnite Lorraine C (2010)
    The Myth of Voter Fraud
  39. 10.1080/10570314.2016.1143562
     ↗
  40. 10.12968/sece.2009.11.1650
     ↗
  41. 10.1177/0196859910371375
     ↗
  42. Ono Kent A. (2011)
    Critical Rhetorics of Race
  43. Perelman Chaim (1969)
    The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation
  44. Purcell v. Gonzalez. 549 U.S. 2006. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/549/1/#tab-opinion-1962255. A…
  45. Regents of the University of California v.Bakke. 438 U.S. 265, 1978.
  46. (2000)
    Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board
  47. Rucho v. Common Cause. 588 U.S. 2019
  48. Serwer, Adam. “If You Didn’t Vote for Trump, Your Vote Is Fraudulent.”The Atlantic, 10 Dec. 2020. https://www…
  49. 10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.01.006
     ↗
  50. Shaw v. Reno. 509 U.S 630 1993.
  51. Shelby County v. Holder. 570 U.S. 2013.
  52. Sotomayor, Sonia. “Dissenting Opinion.”Abbott v. Perez. 585 U.S. 2018.
  53. 10.18574/nyu/9780814762899.001.0001
     ↗
  54. Sullivan Shannon (2007)
    Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance
     ↗
  55. Thomas, Clarence. “Dissenting Opinion.”Republican Part of Pennsylvania v. Veronica Degraffenreid. 592 U.S. 2021.
  56. Tolson Franita (2012)
    Vanderbilt Law Review
  57. US Congress. H.R.9. Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, and Coretta Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization an…
  58. Walton Douglas (1996)
    Arguments from Ignorance
  59. 10.1017/CBO9781107110311
     ↗
  60. 10.1111/j.1753-9137.2010.01090.x
     ↗
  61. 10.1080/17524032.2011.593535
     ↗
  62. 10.1080/10417941003613263
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly May 2026
    Communicating Diversity and Inclusion in LinkedIn Job Advertisements ↗
    Rashid Ashraf; Said Badreddine; Mohamed I. Albeshr; Hamsa Al Ammari; Malik Muhammad Sheheryar Khan; Pranav Naithani
    discourse analysis professional writing race and writing
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication Apr 2026
    Book Review: Engaging Museums: Rhetorical Education and Social Justice by Lauren E. Obermark ObermarkLauren E. (2022). Engaging Museums: Rhetorical Education and Social Justice . Southern Illinois University Press. 196 pp. $40.00. ISBN: 978-0-80933-850-4(paperback), 978-0-80933-851-1(eBook). ↗
    Kyle P. Vealey; Jeffrey M. Gerding
    rhetorical criticism race and writing book reviews
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Apr 2026
    “Is This Ethical?” New Data on the Ethical Principles and Practices of Document Design ↗
    Leslie Seawright; Amy Hodges; Timothy Ponce
    technical communication race and writing
  4. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    Assessing fairness in finetuned scoring models with demographically restricted training data ↗
    Langdon Holmes; Wesley Morris; Scott Crossley; Joon Suh Choi
    assessment artificial intelligence race and writing
  5. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Mar 2026
    Teaching Radical Love: Implementing Critical Positive Communication Pedagogy in the Classroom ↗
    Vincent Russell; Grace Cheshire; Gabriel Wisnewski-Parks
    writing pedagogy teacher development professional writing race and writing gender and writing disability studies