Argumentation Dec 2021 Open Access

Associating Ethos with Objects: Reasoning from Character of Public Figures to Actions in the World

Katarzyna Budzynska ; Marcin Koszowy Warsaw University of Technology ; Martín Pereira-Fariña Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

Abstract

AbstractEthotic arguments, such as arguments from expert opinion and ad hominem arguments, play an important role in communication practice. In this paper, we argue that there is another type of reasoning from ethos, in which people argue about actions in the world. These subspecies of ethotic arguments are very common in public debates: societies are involved in heated disputes about what should be done with monuments of historical figures such as Stalin or Colston: Should we demolish the building they funded? Should we revere their statues? Should the street named after them be renamed?; and the general public vividly argue about what should be done with the legacy of producers, directors and actors in debates of the #MeToo movement: Should their new movies be distributed? Should their scenes be deleted from motion pictures? Should their stars from the Hollywood Walk of Fame be removed? Many arguments in these debates boil down to the character of the public figures: He was a slave trader!—But he is a part of our history; He harassed a young girl!—But he is an important actor. The reasoning step here is legitimised by the association between a person and an extra-linguistic object: the association between a historical figure and their statue or between an actor and their movie. The nature of this association is explained in the paper using Peirce’s theory of signs. We propose to extend an existing approach to patterns of reasoning from ethos that will help us to shed new light on ethotic argumentation and open an avenue for a systematic account of these unexplored argument forms.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2021-12-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-021-09552-4
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
argument public rhetoric
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (41) · 7 in this index

  1. N Aristotle (1991)
    Rhetoric
  2. K Atkinson (2007)
    Atkinson, K., and T. Bench-Capon. 2007. Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based a…
    Artificial Intelligence  ↗
  3. JL Austin (1962)
    How to do things with words
  4. A Brinton (1986)
    Brinton, A. 1986. Ethotic argument. History of Philosophy Quarterly 3: 245–257.
    History of Philosophy Quarterly
  5. K Budzynska (2010)
    Budzynska, K. 2010. Argument analysis: components of interpersonal argumentation. Frontiers in Artificial Int…
    Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Show all 41 →
  1. RB Cialdini (2001)
    Influence: Science and practice
  2. HH Clark (1990)
    Clark, H.H., and R.J. Gerrig. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language (Baltimore) 66 (4): 764–805.
    Language (Baltimore)
  3. I Copi (2005)
    Introduction to logic
  4. Duthie R, Budzynska K (2016) Classifying types of ethos supports and attacks. In: Modgil S, Budzynska K, Lawr…
  5. Eemeren (2013)
    In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of…
    Argumentation
  6. MS Engel (1980)
    Analyzing informal fallacies
  7. Fairclough, I. 2016. A dialectical profile for the evaluation of practical arguments. Rozenberg Quarterly
  8. Fairclough, I., Madroane, I.D. 2014. An argumentative approach to policy “framing”. Competing “frames” and po…
  9. A Goldman (1999)
    Knowledge in a social world
     ↗
  10. Goodwin (2011)
    Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts
    Argumentation
  11. Goodwin, J. 2019. Re-framing climate controversy: The strategies of the Hartwell Paper. In: Proceedings of th…
  12. L Groarke (2008)
    Good reasoning matters!
  13. M Koszowy (2019)
    Koszowy, M., and D. Walton. 2019. Epistemic and deontic authority in the argumentum ad verecundiam. Pragmatic…
    Pragmatics and Society  ↗
  14. J Lawrence (2016)
    Lawrence, J., and C. Reed. 2016. Argument mining using argumentation scheme structures. Computational Models …
    Computational Models of Argument (COMMA2016)
  15. J Leefmann (2020)
    Leefmann, J., and S. Lesle. 2020. Knowledge from scientific expert testimony without epistemic trust. Synthes…
    Synthese  ↗
  16. Leff (1993)
    The uses of Aristotle's Rhetoric in contemporary American scholarship
    Argumentation
  17. Macagno (2013)
    Strategies of Character Attack
    Argumentation
  18. Macagno et al. (2018)
    Practical Reasoning Arguments: A Modular Approach
    Argumentation
  19. S Milgram (1974)
    Obedience to authority: An experimental view
  20. E Musi (2019)
    Musi, E., and M. Aakhus. 2019. Framing fracking. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8 (1): 112–135.
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  ↗
  21. Musi, E., Ghosh, D., Muresan, S. 2016. Towards feasible guidelines for the annotation of argument schemes. In…
     ↗
  22. Musi, E., Alhindi, T., Stede, M., Kriese, L., Muresan, S., Rocci, A. 2019. A multi-layer annotated corpus of …
  23. CS Peirce (1982)
    The writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition
  24. Pereira-Fariña, M., Koszowy, M., Budzynska, K., Reed, C. 2019. Dialogical aspects of appeals to authority in …
  25. RE Petty (1986)
    Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change
     ↗
  26. J Searle (1985)
    Foundations of illocutionary logic
  27. JR Searle (1969)
    Speech acts: An Essay in the philosophy of language
     ↗
  28. Visser et al. (2021)
    Annotating Argument Schemes
    Argumentation
  29. Wagemans (2011)
    The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion
    Argumentation
  30. D Walton (1997)
    Appeal to expert opinion: Arguments from authority
  31. D Walton (1998)
    Ad Hominem arguments
  32. D Walton (1999)
    Walton, D. 1999. Ethotic arguments and fallacies: The credibility function in multi-agent dialogue systems. P…
    Pragmatics & Cognition  ↗
  33. D Walton (1995)
    Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning
  34. D Walton (2008)
    Argumentation schemes
     ↗
  35. M Witek (2013)
    Theory of imperatives from different points of view, logic
  36. Zenker, F., and S. Yu. 2020. A new typology for arguments from authority. Proceedings of the Ontario Society …
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Argumentation Apr 2026
    A Normative Pragmatic Inquiry into the Volatility of Norms in Argumentation ↗
    Sally Jackson
    discourse analysis argument qualitative research public rhetoric
  2. Argumentation Feb 2026
    The Influence of Justification Content and Argument Source on Perceived Argument Quality ↗
    Kaisa Herne; Josefina Sipinen; Peter Söderlund; Elina Kestilä-Kekkonen
    argument public rhetoric
  3. Res Rhetorica Jan 2026
    Politicians’ privacy management in social media as a tool for shaping ethos ↗
    Anna M. Kiełbiewska
    rhetorical criticism argument social media public rhetoric
  4. Argumentation Dec 2025
    Questions as Elements of Argumentation in Political Debates ↗
    Daniel Ziembicki
    discourse analysis argument artificial intelligence public rhetoric
  5. Philosophy & Rhetoric Apr 2025
    What It Takes to Want to Turn to Others ↗
    Nirvana Tanoukhi
    argument public rhetoric