From Figure to Argument: Contrarium in Roman Rhetoric

Manfred Kraus University of Tübingen
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2007-09-17
DOI
10.1007/s10503-007-9042-2
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (61) · 4 in this index

  1. Abdullaev S. (1977) Zu den Möglichkeiten der Transposition der Satzarten im Deutschen – Die Grundstrukturen d…
    Deutsch als Fremdsprache
  2. Anzilotti G. I. (1982) The Rhetorical Question as an Indirect Speech Device in English and Italian. Canadian …
    Canadian Modern Language Review  
  3. A New Approach to the Logical Theory of Interrogations, Part I: Analysis
  4. Barth E. M., Martens J. L. (1977/78) Argumentum Ad Hominem: From Chaos to Formal Dialectics. Logique et Analy…
    Logique et Analyse. Nouvelle Série
  5. An Analysis of Questions: Preliminary Report
Show all 61 →
  1. Blankenship K. L., Craig T. Y. (2006) Rhetorical Question Use and Resistance to Persuasion: An Attitude Stren…
    Journal of Language and Social Psychology  
  2. Bobzien S. (1996) Stoic Syllogistic. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14:133–192
    Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy  
  3. Brinton A. (1985) A Rhetorical View of the Ad Hominem. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63:50–63
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy  
  4. Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings
  5. Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays
  6. Butler, H. E. (ed.): 1922, The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian. With an English translation, Vol. III, Will…
  7. Attitudes Towards Language Variation: Social and Applied Contexts
  8. Caplan, H. (ed.): 1954, [Cicero], Ad C. Herennium de ratione dicendi. With an English translation, William He…
  9. Conrad R. (1982) Rhetorische Fragen. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 27:420–428
    Zeitschrift für Slawistik  
  10. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discuss…
  11. Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
  12. Argumentation
  13. Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings
  14. Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings
  15. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach
  16. Eemeren F. H. van, Houtlosser P. (1999) Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Discourse Studies 1…
    Discourse Studies  
  17. Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis
  18. Advances in Pragma-Dialectics
  19. Argumentation in Practice
  20. Engel S. M. (1994) The Five Forms of the Ad Hominem Fallacy. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Discipline…
    Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines  
  21. Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline. Proceedings of the Conference on Argumenta…
  22. Frank J. (1990) You Call That a Rhetorical Question? Forms and Functions of Rhetorical Questions in Conversat…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  23. Die stoische Logik
  24. Grésillon A. (1980) Zum linguistischen Status rhetorischer Fragen. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik …
    Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik  
  25. Hamblin, C. L.: 1970, Fallacies. Methuen, London; 1998, repr. with a Preface by J. Plecnik and J. Hoaglund an…
  26. Mistakes of Reason: Essays in Honour of John Woods
  27. Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for F.H. van Eemeren on the Occasion of his …
  28. What Else Can I Tell You? A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical Questions as Discursive…
  29. Argumentation
  30. Arguing on the Toulmin Model
  31. Krifka M. (1995) The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polarity Items. Linguistic Analysis 25:1–49
    Linguistic Analysis
  32. Stoic Logic
  33. Rhetorische Fragen
  34. Handbook of the History of Logic, Vol. 1: Greek, Indian and Arabian Logic
  35. Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T., Heesacker M. (1981) Effects of Rhetorical Questions on Persuasion: A Cognitive R…
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  
  36. Marcus Tullius Cicero, Topica. Edited with a Translation, Introduction and Commentary
  37. Riposati, B.: 1947, Studi sui ‹Topica’ di Cicerone, Società editrice ‹Vita e pensiero’, Milano
  38. Rohde H. (2006) Rhetorical Questions as Redundant Interrogatives. San Diego Linguistics Papers 2:134–168
    San Diego Linguistics Papers
  39. Rooy R. van (2003) Negative Polarity Items in Questions: Strength as Relevance. Journal of Semantics 20:239–273
    Journal of Semantics  
  40. Sadock, J. M.: 1971, ‹Queclaratives’, in Papers from the 7th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Ch…
  41. Schmidt-Radefeldt J. (1977) On So-called ‹Rhetorical’ Questions. Journal of Pragmatics 1:375–392
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  42. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts
  43. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts
  44. How Can You Say That? Rhetorical Questions in Argumentative Texts
  45. Boethius’s In Ciceronis Topica. Translated, with Notes and an Introduction
  46. Toulmin, S. E.: 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2003, 2nd edn., Cambridge …
  47. Arguer’s Position: A Pragmatic Study of Ad Hominem Attack, Criticism, Refutation and Fallacy
  48. Argumentation
  49. Questions and Questioning
  50. Begging the Question: Circular Reasoning as a Tactic of Argumentation
  51. Walton D. N. (1991b) Critical Faults and Fallacies of Questioning. Journal of Pragmatics 15:337–366
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  52. Argumentation
  53. Ad Hominem Arguments
  54. Woods J., Walton D. (1976) Ad Hominem. Philosophical Forum 8:1–20
    Philosophical Forum
  55. Zillman D. (1972) Rhetorical Elicitation of Agreement in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psycho…
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  
  56. Zillman D. (1974) Rhetorical Elicitation of Concession in Persuasion. The Journal of Social Psychology 94:223–236
    The Journal of Social Psychology