Abstract

Research Article| January 01 2007 The Oldest Extant Rhetorical Contribution to the Study of Fallacies (Cicero On invention, 1.78–96, and Rhetoric to Herennius, 2.31–46: Reducible to Hermagoras?) Antoine Braet Antoine Braet Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2007) 40 (4): 416–433. https://doi.org/10.2307/25655290 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Antoine Braet; The Oldest Extant Rhetorical Contribution to the Study of Fallacies (Cicero On invention, 1.78–96, and Rhetoric to Herennius, 2.31–46: Reducible to Hermagoras?). Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2007; 40 (4): 416–433. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/25655290 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2007 The Pennsylvania State University2007The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2007-01-01
DOI
10.2307/25655290
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (20) · 5 in this index

  1. Achard, G., ed. 1994. De l'invention/Ciceron. Paris: Les Beiles Lettres.
  2. Adamietz. J. 1960. Ciceros de inventione und die Rhetorik ad Herennium. Dissertation Marburg.
  3. Braet, A. C. 1987. “The Classical Doctrine of Status and Rhetorical Theory of Argumentation.” Philosophy and …
  4. Argumentation
  5. -. 2004b. “Hermagoras and the epicheireme.” Rhetorica 22:327^7.
Show all 20 →
  1. Rhetorica
  2. Argumentation
  3. Rhetorica
  4. Eemeren, F. H. van. 2001. “Fallacies.” In Encyclopedia of Rhetoric, ed. T. O. Sloane, 295-301. New York: Oxford UP.
  5. Argumentation
  6. -. 1992b. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawre…
  7. Hamblin, Ch. L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.
  8. Hohmann, H. 2001. “Stasis.” In Encyclopedia of Rhetoric, ed. T. O. Sloane, 741-45. New York: Oxford UP.
  9. Kroll, W. 1934. “Rhetorica III. Quintilian und Severianus (Das semeion).” Philologus 89:334—41.
  10. -. 1936. “Das Epicheirema.” Sitzungsberichte der Akad. der Wissenschaften in Wien. Philos. Hist.K1.216(2):l-17.
  11. Matthes, D. 1958. “Hermagoras vom Temnos 1904-1955.” Lustrum 3:58-214, 262-78.
  12. Nuchelmans, G. 1993. “On the Fourfould Root of the Argumentum ad Hominem.” In Empirical Logic and Public Deba…
  13. Schellens, P. J. 1985. Redelijke argumenten. Een onderzoek naar normen voor kritische lezers. Dordrecht/Cinna…
  14. Schweinfurt-Walla, S. 1986. Studien zu den rhetorischen Überzeugungsmitteln bei Cicero und Aristoteles. Tübin…
  15. Walton, D. N. 1996. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.