Research Article| February 01 1991 Identitas, Similitudo, and Contrarietas in Gervasius of Melkley's Ars poetica: A Stasis of Style William M. Purcell William M. Purcell University of Washington, Department of Speech Communication, DL-15, Seattle, Washington 98195. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1991) 9 (1): 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1991.9.1.67 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation William M. Purcell; Identitas, Similitudo, and Contrarietas in Gervasius of Melkley's Ars poetica: A Stasis of Style. Rhetorica 1 February 1991; 9 (1): 67–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1991.9.1.67 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1991, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1991 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

The authors recount their attempt to analyze a case study in terms of two conflicting rhetorics: a collectivist rhetoric that values most the contributions individuals make to an ongoing collective project and an individualist rhetoric that values most the original and autonomous voice. These two rhetorics conflict in the experience of one writer working concurrently in a literature seminar within a university English department and in the public relations office of a reproductive services agency. This conflict, centering on different rhetorical ethics, had less to do with competence than with commitment: the writer's commitment to the individualist ethics practiced in the writing she did in the literature seminar prevented her from valuing the writing she did at the agency that worked toward a collectivist end. The authors then examine how this analysis is problematized by alternative interpretations of this case that demonstrate that the collectivist rhetoric practiced by researchers and theorists of writing itself involves the interaction of conflicting individualist assertions. This analysis suggests that the most useful theoretical insights any case might provide into the question of how writing ought to be taught are embodied in the exchange of interpretations that case provokes and in the confrontation of diverse arguments that emerge from that exchange.

(1990). Positional historiography and Margaret Fuller's public discourse of mutual interpretation. Rhetoric Society Quarterly: Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 233-239.

The crossing of poetry and oratory developed naturally for Philip Sidney, as it did for Aristotle (Murrin 8). Because of Sidney's classical education at Shrewsbury, his years at Christ Church College in Oxford, and his exposure to continental philosophy during his European travels, his poetry and prose embody a unique interpretation of classical Greek philosophy and oratory. In fact, J. E. Spingarn states:

Graduate engineers in the United Kingdom are frequently criticized for lacking communication skills. In undergraduate courses, such as civil engineering, which are mathematically and technically oriented, it is very difficult to find space within a full timetable for the development of communication skills. At Aston University this work has been integrated successfully into a course on Public Sector Planning. Lectures are complemented by a project which culminates in the students participating in a simulated Public Inquiry—part of the planning process intended to provide a forum for public debate. Not only do the students learn about the planning process, tangible and intangible aspects of a water resource development, but at the same time develop their written, oral, and decision-making skills.

In ancient Greece, a was, literally, a leader of the people. The meaning of the term has changed considerably since then, however, and a today is regarded as someone who appeals to greed, fear, and hatred (Safire 163), a politician who achieves or holds power stirring up the feelings of his audience and leading them [sic] to action despite the considerations which weigh against (Scruton 115). If demagogue is a modem day devil term, then its usage will be accompanied by the degree of subjectivity which is a hallmark of such words and phrases in modern society. In short, the label demagogue is often used as a weapon by one group to another (Clark 423). This is especially true in American politics, where the term has been used as an attack word as far back as 1808 (Safire 163). This subjectivity may help to explain the wide variety of persons who have been, at one time or another, labeled as demagogues. Some members of this less-than-elite group are obvious and noncontroversial candidates: Senator Joseph McCarthy (Fisher; Luthin; Baskerville), Huey Long (Gaske; Luthin; Bormann; although exception to this label for Long is taken by Williams), George Wallace (Johannesen), Adolf Hitler (Blackbourn; Fishman), Louis Farrakhan (Rosenblatt), and such well-known Nineteenth Century figures as Kearney (Lomas, Dennis Kearney), Pitchfork Ben Tillman (Clark), and William Jennings Bryant (Tulis). Other public figures who have been nominated for the list are more obscure, including Ma and Pa Ferguson (Luthin; Herman), Gerald K. Smith (Sitton), and Henry Harmon Spalding (Thompson), while others would seem, at first glance, to be unlikely candidates: Jimmy Carter (Will), Jesse Jackson (Drew), Andrew Johnson (Tulis), and Senator Joseph Biden (Barnes). In attempting to understand what is nominally called demagoguery, however, two important distinctions should be made. The first involves demagoguery and rhetoric. Although demagogues use rhetoric (as noted above), and although demagogic rhetoric has certain identifiable characteristics (as will be discussed below), it does not necessarily follow that a speaker who uses demagogic rhetoric on a particular occasion is thus properly to be considered a demagogue. As Luthin notes, there exists a bit of demagoguery in the most lofty of statesmen. . (355). Thus, a would be correctly defined as one who habitually uses the hallmarks of demagoguery to be discussed later in this review of literature. A second important distinction should be made, this one concerning the difference between what is nominally called demagoguery and nominally called agitation. The distinction has often been blurred in practice; for many, all agitators are demagogues, and vice versa (Lomas, The Agitator 18). Put simply, an agitator is someone who seeks to effect social change through rhetoric. The term often has a negative connotation because the status quo is usually resistant to change and thus wary of those who urge it (McEdwards 36). Although the agitator may resort to demagoguery, agitative rhetoric is not, in itself, demagogic (Lomas, The Agitator 19).

Research Article| February 01 1990 Aristotle's Rhetoric in Byzantium Thomas M. Conley Thomas M. Conley Department of Speech Communication, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 244 Lincoln Hall, 702 South Wright Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801 Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1990) 8 (1): 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1990.8.1.29 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Thomas M. Conley; Aristotle's Rhetoric in Byzantium. Rhetorica 1 February 1990; 8 (1): 29–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1990.8.1.29 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1990, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1990 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Contemporary scholarship in rhetoric has recognized Ralph Waldo Emerson's interests in rhetorical theory. James A. Berlin, for example, who identifies Emerson's romantic rhetoric, in opposition to the rhetoric of the late eighteenth century, as a precursor of several modem tendencies, deals adequately with Emerson in his survey of nineteenth-century American writing instruction (42-57). Berlin's treatment of Emerson will be assumed here, qualified by Judy F. Parham's point that the tension between private and public in Emerson is a productive one (80). However, although he implies that Henry David Thoreau's position does not differ significantly from Emerson's, Berlin does not treat Thoreau's theoretical statements separately. Similarly, although dozens of literary scholars have investigated Thoreau's rhetorical practices, to my knowledge no analysis has been done on his rhetorical theory.l My intention is to show that Thoreau presents a theoretical version of eloquence distinct from Emerson's. Although this presentation is by no means unified in terms of a quintessential reduction, a consistent version does emerge across various works and personas, one fundamentally incompatible as well with the psychological rhetoric Thoreau studied in Richard Whately's Elements of Rhetoric and the opinions of Harvard's Professor of Rhetoric and Oratory, Edward T. Channing. Thoreau's thoughts on eloquence, I suggest, should be aligned with a much different tradition in order to highlight their unique character.

Research Article| November 01 1989 On the Rhetorical Significance of P. Hamb. 131 Robert N. Gaines Robert N. Gaines Department of Speech Communication, University of Maryland at College Park, Tawes Fine Arts Building 1147, College Park, Maryland 20742-1221. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1989) 7 (4): 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1989.7.4.329 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Robert N. Gaines; On the Rhetorical Significance of P. Hamb. 131. Rhetorica 1 November 1989; 7 (4): 329–340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1989.7.4.329 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1989, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1989 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| May 01 1989 Political Style in Cicero's Letters to Atticus Robert Hariman Robert Hariman Department of Speech Communication, Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa 50311. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1989) 7 (2): 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1989.7.2.145 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Robert Hariman; Political Style in Cicero's Letters to Atticus. Rhetorica 1 May 1989; 7 (2): 145–158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1989.7.2.145 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1989, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1989 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| February 01 1989 The Invisible Rhetorician: Charles Darwin's "Third Party" Strategy John Angus Campbell John Angus Campbell Department of Speech Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, Washmgton 98195. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1989) 7 (1): 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1989.7.1.55 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation John Angus Campbell; The Invisible Rhetorician: Charles Darwin's "Third Party" Strategy. Rhetorica 1 February 1989; 7 (1): 55–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1989.7.1.55 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1989, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1989 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Of all the bruising confrontations between the capitalist and communist power blocks perhaps none was so staggering as the Cuban missile crisis. Most Americans patriotically rallied around our determined young president in this great moment of crisis, but there were other Americans who spoke with a different voice then who presumed to disagree with the dominant opinion. These were the voices from the left, now the old left. Their rhetorical response is my subject. By concentrating on several specimens written from a leftist perspective in response to a single event, I create a framework for analyzing the discourse of an ideology to demonstrate the influence of that ideology on and argument, together with the usefulnesses of an analytic method. Antecedent to this analysis are particular considerations about style, argument and method which lead to other considerations peculiar to the relation of political discourse to the world. Because the event focused opinion strongly, and time gives perspective, I have chosen written and oral reactions to the Cuban missile crisis. In addition to selections of written from three leftist newspapers, the National Guardian, The Weekly People, and The Catholic Worker, I have included speech samples on the same topic from Dean Rusk, then Secretary of State, as a contrast to the rhetoric of the left. To analyze this discourse I use Walker Gibson's style machine as he calls it developed to account for distinctions...in the voices addressing (115), distinctions which he breaks down into tough, sweet and stuffy talkers. Gibson's machine, consisting of sixteen grammatical-rhetorical qualities, is appended (A). Other available descriptions or classifications of or argument are Huntington Brown's deliberative, expository and prophetic, Edwin Black's exhortation and argument, and Aristotle's topics. Brown and Black analyze thought methodology with some consideration of style. The neo-Aristotelians, on the other hand, consider and thought combined into argumentative methods. I follow the classical topics in considering rhetorical argument (Rhetoric chs. 22, 23, 24; Corbett 94-132). My particular assumptions are that belief influences style, that while prose styles can be typed individual differences remain, that includes varieties of diction, syntax, and argument Further, I seek an attitude towards language, an attitude, however, influenced not by cultural or individual psychology, but by political belief. Because political writers argue, their arguments common to all rhetoric can also be typed. Argument creates patterns which shapes. For Gibson is a matter of sheer individual will, a desire for a particular kind of self-definition no matter what the circumstances (24). Political belief can condition will. For both Marie H. Nichols (75), and Edwin Black (Persona) reveals distinctive political personalities. In selecting a usable analytical methodology I had either to invent my own, or use an existing one. I chose Gibson's because we share similar concerns. I want to know what kind of voice speaks. What does the use of that voice imply? How do I determine trust? I also want to know the attitude of that voice towards subject and audience. If Gibson can help to answer these questions, then I accept his work saving the necessity of inventing yet another method, concentrating instead on the results produced. In general, stylistics seems more of a discourse on method than on results. Although we want to know what ails us, naming is not enough. To know that Dorothy Day talks tough does not suffice. We know there are other names than tough, sweet or stuffy. The point is not just to label, but to penetrate into the thought behind the voice aided by a given point of view. Gibson describes his work as primitive. Primitive, yet legitimate because applied he yields insight His method reveals attitude just as psychiatric categories, which might also be called primitive, reveal motive. If the arguments which pattern are traditional and discernible, their correlations with are not as clear. The advertiser, for example, speaks sweetly with recognizably dubious argument. Those political voices purring and storming at us must also be judged by how they argue so their trustworthiness can be determined. We can uncover falsehood by showing how a statement varies from reality--plain lying. We can discover understanding of mental illness by probing the discordance the aberrant mind creates

Chapman/Tate descriptive survey of 38 doctoral programs in rhetoric and composition has given us valuable information about these programs, which, for the most part, have sprung up only within the last ten years. survey, published in the Spring 1987 Review (124-86), revealed our programs' deep structure; it also has raised some questions about the definition, development and direction of our doctoral programs in rhetoric and composition. Few of the 38 programs that sent written materials for the survey listed classical rhetoric as core requirement, and almost half listed no history of rhetoric courses. However, 35 of the 38 programs listed theories of composition course. Because the availability of, as well as the teaching approach to, classical rhetoric can show the foundations on which our programs are built and the theoretical directions they may be taking, I prepared questionnaire on the classical rhetoric course offered in English departments, mailed it to 41 doctoral programs in rhetoric and composition, and eventually received 37 completed questionnaires. survey results not only reveal some foundations and direction of our programs in rhetoric and composition but also point out areas for further study. Does the program offer course in classical rhetoric and, if so, is the course part of the core requirement were two of the primary survey questions. Twenty-eight out of the 37 programs (76%) that sent written materials reported they offer course either in classical rhetoric or wherein substantial part is devoted to classical Eight (23%) do not offer the course, but in six of these eight the course is offered in Speech Communication. Two programs reported that the course is listed but not taught. And two programs reported the course is not offered at all. Four programs reported that the course offered in the English Department is also offered in Speech Communication. 76 percent of programs offering the course differ from the Chapman/Tate percentages because some of the 28 programs defined theirs as course in classical rhetoric where only one-third, about five weeks, or less, is devoted to classical These courses are, in the words of one respondent, a rush through rhetoric. Some courses, titled Rhetoric and (or Composition and Rhetoric), are actually topic courses that can take any focus. In one program it depends on who teaches the course whether it is history of rhetoric or the teaching of composition. Course names are quite varied. Only six are called History of Rhetoric, and two are named History and Theories. (The naming of one course title, survey respondent told me, has long and hilarious story. In 1976 the course had been The of Rhetoric, but that's the title of Richards' book, so the title was changed to Philosophy of Composition, which became the title of Hirsch's book, so the program changed it to its present title, The Rhetorical Tradition and the Teaching of Composition, at which point Knoblauch and Brannon appeared.) Other course titles are Theory and Practice of Rhetoric, Classical and Modern Discourse, Major Rhetorical Texts, Historical Studies, Rhetoric of Written Discourse. I was somewhat surprised that more of the course names didn't have the word written in the title to distinguish the course from the one offered in Speech for the last 75 years. Perhaps crossing departmental lines in the teaching of rhetoric is not the problem it was in the 70's. This subject itself would make an interesting study. classical rhetoric course is core requirement in 50 percent of the programs in contrast to the 91 percent of programs requiring composition theory. (In one program classical rhetoric is required, but it's offered only in Speech Communication.) These percentages suggest that we cannot assume the study of classical rhetoric as foundational for composition studies in our doctoral programs. In fact, it is possible for student to have Ph.D. specialty in rhetoric and composition without having had course in classical question here for further study is, then, how are we to define the rhetoric/composition speialist? next series of survey questions I asked focused on the frequency of the course offering, length of time it has been offered in the program, qualifications of the faculty who teach it, average enrollment and area of stuident specialty. In the majority of programs, the course is offered every other year and has been offered only within the last ten years. Usually, only one person teaches the course, faculty

Michael Paul Rogin, "Ronald Reagan,”; the Movie and Other Episodes in Political Demonology (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1987), 366pp. Jeffrey K. Tulis, The Rhetorical Presidency (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987), 209pp. Gerald Graff. Professing Literature: An Institutional History. University of Chicago Press, 1987. viii+315 pp. $24.95. Joseph Vining, The Authoritative and the Authoritarian, University of Chicago Press, 1986. In Search of Justice: The Indiana Tradition in Speech Communication. Richard J. Jensen and John C. Hammerback (editors). Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi, 1987. 311 Pp. Greek Rhetorical Origins of Christian Faith: An Inquiry. James L. Kinneavy. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987. Pp. ix + 186. Literary Patronage in Greece and Rome. Barbara K. Gold. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press, 1987. Pp. xii + 267. Introduction to Rhetorical Theory. Gerard A. Hauser. New York: Harper and Row, 1986. The Variables of Composition: Process and Product in a Business Setting. Glen J. Broadhead and Richard C. Freed. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1986. 169 Pp.

Research Article| May 01 1988 Orators and Philosophers: A History of the Idea of Liberal Education. Orators and Philosophers: A History of the Idea of Liberal Education.Bruce A. Kimball, with a Foreword by Joseph L. Featherstone. Teachers College Press, 1986. pp. 293. $19.95. Robert Hariman Robert Hariman Department of Speech Communication, Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa 50311. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1988) 6 (2): 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1988.6.2.199 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Robert Hariman; Orators and Philosophers: A History of the Idea of Liberal Education.. Rhetorica 1 May 1988; 6 (2): 199–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1988.6.2.199 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1988, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1988 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| November 01 1987 Transsumptio: A Rhetorical Doctrine of the Thirteenth Century William Purcell William Purcell Department of Speech Communication, Augustana College, Rock Island, IL 61201 Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1987) 5 (4): 369–410. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.4.369 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation William Purcell; Transsumptio: A Rhetorical Doctrine of the Thirteenth Century. Rhetorica 1 November 1987; 5 (4): 369–410. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.4.369 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1987, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1987 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| November 01 1987 Hermogenes' On Types of Style Hermogenes' On Types of Style by Cecil W. Wooten, Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1987, pp. xviii+ 159. Thomas Conley Thomas Conley Department of Speech Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1987) 5 (4): 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.4.431 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Thomas Conley; Hermogenes' On Types of Style. Rhetorica 1 November 1987; 5 (4): 431–436. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.4.431 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1987, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1987 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

he purpose of present paper is to draw attention to some complexities involved in Paul O. Kristeller's classic formulation of nature of Renaissance humanism. According to KristeUer, in a lecture first deUvered in 1954 and reissued most recently in 1979, the humanists of Renaissance were professional successors of medieval Italian didatores, and inherited from them various patterns of epistolography and public oratory, aU more or less deternuned by customs and practical needs of later medieval society. Yet medieval didatores were no classical scholars and used no classical models for their compositions. It was novel contribution of humanists to add firm belief that in order to write and to speak well it was necessary to study and to imitate ancients.' The neat picture of humanism that emerges is of a professional commitment to classicize rhetorical practice of medieval world.

Research Article| August 01 1987 Rhetoric and Law in Pietro Bembo's Opere William E. Wiethoff William E. Wiethoff Department of Speech Communication, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405 Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1987) 5 (3): 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.3.265 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation William E. Wiethoff; Rhetoric and Law in Pietro Bembo's Opere. Rhetorica 1 August 1987; 5 (3): 265–278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.3.265 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1987, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1987 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| August 01 1987 Rhetorical Emphases of Taoism J. Vernon Jensen J. Vernon Jensen Department of Speech Communication, 317 Folwell Hall, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1987) 5 (3): 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.3.219 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation J. Vernon Jensen; Rhetorical Emphases of Taoism. Rhetorica 1 August 1987; 5 (3): 219–229. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.3.219 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1987, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1987 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

ernadino de Sahagun, the foremost chronicler of sixteenth-century Mexico, observed that all nations looked to the learned and powerful to persuade, and to men eminent in moral virtues. There are examples of such men the Greeks and Romans, Spanish, French and Italians. Also among the Aztecs learned, virtuous, and enterprising were held in high esteem, and they elected high priests, lords, chiefs, and captains from among them, however low their destiny may have been. These ruled over the repubUc and lead the armies, and presided over the temples.' Sahagun and others dUigently recorded the orations of these learned, virtuous, and enterprising rhetoricians providing posterity with a remarkable record of pre-Uterate rhetoric. Historians of Mexico have long recognized that an examination of these speeches provides insights into the thought and culture of the Aztecs unavaUable from other sources. To the historian of rhetoric the orations preserved by Sahagun are equally invaluable for they constitute one of the most complete accounts of the rhetoric of an oral culture. Thus an examination of Aztec oratory is instructive of the role of rhetoric in the life of the early Mexicans as well as indica-

Research Article| August 01 1987 The Significance of the Rhetorimachia of Anselm de Besate to the History of Rhetoric Beth S. Bennett Beth S. Bennett Department of Speech Communication, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487 Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1987) 5 (3): 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.3.231 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Beth S. Bennett; The Significance of the Rhetorimachia of Anselm de Besate to the History of Rhetoric. Rhetorica 1 August 1987; 5 (3): 231–250. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.3.231 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1987, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1987 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

The authors offer a few simple and effective suggestions that may help a speaker overcome problems of public speaking. These include rehearsing moderately, storing and retrieving main points and supporting points in the order they are planned, talking to a test audience, speaking clearly, maintaining correct posture, nonequivocation, talking rather than reading verbatim, and retaining control.

Research Article| May 01 1987 Rhetoric and Poetics in the Early Middle Ages Paul E. Prill Paul E. Prill Dept. of Speech Communication, David Lipscomb College, Nashville, TN 37203 Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1987) 5 (2): 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.2.129 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Paul E. Prill; Rhetoric and Poetics in the Early Middle Ages. Rhetorica 1 May 1987; 5 (2): 129–147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.2.129 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1987, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1987 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| May 01 1987 Richard Whately and the Revival of Logic in Nineteenth-Century England Raymie E. McKerrow Raymie E. McKerrow Dept. Speech Communication, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469 Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1987) 5 (2): 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.2.163 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Raymie E. McKerrow; Richard Whately and the Revival of Logic in Nineteenth-Century England. Rhetorica 1 May 1987; 5 (2): 163–185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.2.163 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search Copyright 1987, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1987 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

the writer's audience. Writing involves moving material from the inside the outside. We need only consult a few recent composition texts see how this inner/outer metaphor shapes the language we use talk about teaching writing. We tell students that the writer's mind is a kind of a box-a storehouse or reservoir, a pool of thoughts, filled with tremendous reserves draw upon. We speak of student writers opening the lid of the mind in order free what is stored inside. As teachers of writing, we want help students tap these sources, sift through your memory, and dredge up ideas. We want help students overcome writer's block, to unlock your mind and release information.' To make this happen, we talk about brainstorming, in which we make a frontal assault open the stronghold of the mind. And when this happens, we call the effect linguistic fluency, the flowing outward of inner speech from the reservoir of the mind. The dualism of this inner/outer metaphor, moreover, permeates much of the discourse of composition studies. Writing, many teachers, researchers, and theorists assume, begins inside, in the inner speech of private verbal thought, and is only gradually transformed into the outer written speech of public text. We habitually think of the process of composing as a movement from monologue, where writers address primarily themselves, dialogue, where writers address others. In this view composing transforms what is inside the writer's head into an external text that can stand by itself. Composing, that is, converts the associative, idiosyncratic, self-referential language that writers use talk themselves into autonomous texts that supply the interpretive contexts, logical connections, and explicit meanings readers expect of public discourse. James Britton's expressive and transactional functions, Janet Emig's reflexive and extensive modes of writing, and Linda Flower's writer-based and reader-based prose, however they may differ in conception and formulation, all assume the polarity of private and public language and an inner-to-outer directionality in composing, a movement, as Flower puts it, from thinking in code

Research Article| February 01 1987 Let Your Words Be Few: Symbolism of Speaking and Silence among Seventeenth-Century Quakers Let Your Words Be Few: Symbolism of Speaking and Silence among Seventeenth-Century Quakers. By Richard Bauman. Cambridge Studies in Oral and Literate Culture, No. 8. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1983; pp . viii + 168. $32.50; paper $9.95. J. Vernon Jensen J. Vernon Jensen Dept. of Speech Communication, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1987) 5 (1): 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.1.121 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation J. Vernon Jensen; Let Your Words Be Few: Symbolism of Speaking and Silence among Seventeenth-Century Quakers. Rhetorica 1 February 1987; 5 (1): 121–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1987.5.1.121 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1987, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1987 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| November 01 1986 Johannes Tauler: Sermons Johannes Tauler: Sermons, translated by Maria Shrady, The Classics of Western Spirituality, New York and Toronto, Paulist Press: 1985. pp. xvi + 183. $9.95 (paper). Thomas Conley Thomas Conley Dept. of Speech Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1986) 4 (4): 423–424. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.4.423.2 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Thomas Conley; Johannes Tauler: Sermons. Rhetorica 1 November 1986; 4 (4): 423–424. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.4.423.2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1986, The International Society for The History of Rhetoric1986 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| November 01 1986 Byzantine Teaching on Figures and Tropes: An Introduction Thomas Conley Thomas Conley Dept. of Speech Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1986) 4 (4): 335–374. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.4.335 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Thomas Conley; Byzantine Teaching on Figures and Tropes: An Introduction. Rhetorica 1 November 1986; 4 (4): 335–374. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.4.335 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1986, The International Society for The History of Rhetoric1986 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| November 01 1986 Biblical Epic and Rhetorical Paraphrase in Late Antiquity Biblical Epic and Rhetorical Paraphrase in Late Antiquity by Michael Roberts, ARCA: Classical and Mediaeval Texts, Liverpool (Francis Cairns, 1985), pp. x-l-253. Thomas Conley Thomas Conley Dept. of Speech Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1986) 4 (4): 423. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.4.423.1 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Thomas Conley; Biblical Epic and Rhetorical Paraphrase in Late Antiquity. Rhetorica 1 November 1986; 4 (4): 423. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.4.423.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1986, The International Society for The History of Rhetoric1986 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| November 01 1986 Amatory Persuasion in Antiquity: Studies in Theory and Practice Amatory Persuasion in Antiquity: Studies in Theory and Practiceby Nicolas Gross. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1985. pp. 192. Thomas Conley Thomas Conley Dept. of Speech Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1986) 4 (4): 424–425. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.4.424 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Thomas Conley; Amatory Persuasion in Antiquity: Studies in Theory and Practice. Rhetorica 1 November 1986; 4 (4): 424–425. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.4.424 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1986, The International Society for The History of Rhetoric1986 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| August 01 1986 Alexander Richardson's Puritan Theory of Discourse John C. Adams John C. Adams Dept. of Speech Communication & Theatre Arts, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4234 USA Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1986) 4 (3): 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.3.255 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation John C. Adams; Alexander Richardson's Puritan Theory of Discourse. Rhetorica 1 August 1986; 4 (3): 255–274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.3.255 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1986, The International Society for The History of Rhetoric1986 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| August 01 1986 The Death of Rhetoric and its Rebirth in Philosophy Jane Sutton Jane Sutton Dept. of Speech Communication, Pennsylvania State University, York, PA 17403 USA Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1986) 4 (3): 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.3.203 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Jane Sutton; The Death of Rhetoric and its Rebirth in Philosophy. Rhetorica 1 August 1986; 4 (3): 203–226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.3.203 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1986, The International Society for The History of Rhetoric1986 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| August 01 1986 Donne, Milton, and the End of Humanist Rhetoric Donne, Milton, and the End of Humanist Rhetoric by Thomas O. Sloane, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985. pp. xvi + 332 Thomas Conley Thomas Conley Dept. of Speech Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1986) 4 (3): 293–295. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.3.293 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Thomas Conley; Donne, Milton, and the End of Humanist Rhetoric. Rhetorica 1 August 1986; 4 (3): 293–295. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.3.293 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1986, The International Society for The History of Rhetoric1986 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| May 01 1986 Cicero in Theory and Practice: The Securing of Good Will in the Exordia of Five Forensic Speeches Paul Prill Paul Prill Department of Speech Communication, David Lipscomb College, Nashville, TN 37203, USA Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1986) 4 (2): 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.2.93 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Paul Prill; Cicero in Theory and Practice: The Securing of Good Will in the Exordia of Five Forensic Speeches. Rhetorica 1 May 1986; 4 (2): 93–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1986.4.2.93 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1986, The International Society for The History of Rhetoric1986 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| August 01 1985 Philodemus on the Three Activities of Rhetorical Invention Robert N. Gaines Robert N. Gaines Department of Speech Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1985) 3 (3): 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1985.3.3.155 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Robert N. Gaines; Philodemus on the Three Activities of Rhetorical Invention. Rhetorica 1 August 1985; 3 (3): 155–163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1985.3.3.155 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1985, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1985 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| February 01 1985 Charles Rollin's Traité and the Rhetorical Theories of Smith, Campbell, and Blair Barbara Warnick Barbara Warnick Department of Speech Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, U.S.A. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1985) 3 (1): 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1985.3.1.45 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Barbara Warnick; Charles Rollin's Traité and the Rhetorical Theories of Smith, Campbell, and Blair. Rhetorica 1 February 1985; 3 (1): 45–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1985.3.1.45 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1985, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1985 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

In its classical formulation, invention is the canon that provides a rhetorician with more or less systematic procedures for finding argu- ments appropriate to the rhetorical occasion that faces her. In most of the composition textbooks written by influential nineteenth-century teachers of writing, however, invention is either greatly transformed from its classical guise or is slighted altogether. By the end of the nineteenth century most popular composition textbooks written in the vein now described as current-traditional treat invention as a means of systematically delimiting an area of thought in order that the writer may handle its exposition in discourse with maximum clarity. 1 In what follows I trace the evolution-or better, devolution-of the inventional procedure recommended by influential composition texts written during the last half of the nineteenth century, and follow its course into our own century. The term evolution is of course metaphorical; however the continuity and development of the inventional tradition I am tracing is remarkably homogeneous. The first-generation authors in the tradition-Alexander Jamieson, Samuel Newman, H. N. Day, and Alex- ander Bain are among the best known-cite and use the work of British rhetoricians George Campbell or Hugh Blair, while members of the second generation-John Franklin Genung, Adams Sherman Hill, Bar- rett Wendell, Fred Newton Scott, and Joseph V. Denney-generally acknowledge at least Bain, Genung, and Day. And after 1900 until about 1940, Wendell and Scott and Denney are the authoritative names in the tradition; they are as routinely cited in early twentieth-century textbooks as were Blair and Campbell in nineteenth-century works. Early nineteenth-century American school rhetoric is an amalgam of classical and eighteenth-century discourse theory. No American rhetoric text had yet succeeded in creating a satisfactory blend of the epistemological rhetoric formulated by George Campbell in his influen- tial Philosophy of Rhetoric (1776) and the Ciceronian rhetoric imparted by such popular works as John Ward's System of Oratory (1759).2 Alexander Jamieson's popular Grammar of Rhetoric and Polite Litera- ture (1818) nicely represents the confusion of traditions which obtained in the early part of the century.3 Jamieson opens his treatise with a discussion of language which is an imitation of Hugh Blair's treatment of 146

Thomas Montalbo, formerly a financial manager for the U.S. Treasury Department, draws from more than 20 years of public speaking and speech writing experience to produce a book with an interesting premise. This is a call to resurrect the eloquence we usually associate with great issues and great men, but Montalbo points out that eloquence is not restricted to great issues and great men. “Why be an average speaker when you can be one of the best?”

Research Article| November 01 1984 Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England: A Study of the Relationships between Natural Science, Religion, History, Law, and Literature Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England: A Study of the Relationships between Natural Science, Religion, History, Law, and Literature by Barbara Shapfro. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983. 368 Pp. $35.00. David Bartine David Bartine Department of Speech Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1984) 2 (3): 281–284. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1984.2.3.281 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation David Bartine; Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England: A Study of the Relationships between Natural Science, Religion, History, Law, and Literature. Rhetorica 1 November 1984; 2 (3): 281–284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1984.2.3.281 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search Copyright 1984, The International Society for The History of Rhetoric1984 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| November 01 1984 A Rhetorical Interpretation of History John Angus Campbell John Angus Campbell Department of Speech Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1984) 2 (3): 227–266. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1984.2.3.227 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation John Angus Campbell; A Rhetorical Interpretation of History. Rhetorica 1 November 1984; 2 (3): 227–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1984.2.3.227 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1984, The International Society for The History of Rhetoric1984 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| August 01 1984 Greek Rhetoric Under Christian Emperors Greek Rhetoric Under Christian Emperors by George Kennedy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983. pp. xvii + 333. Thomas Conley Thomas Conley Department of Speech Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1984) 2 (2): 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1984.2.2.195 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Thomas Conley; Greek Rhetoric Under Christian Emperors. Rhetorica 1 August 1984; 2 (2): 195–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1984.2.2.195 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1984, The International Society for The History of Rhetoric1984 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Research Article| November 01 1983 Novels and Arguments: Inventing Rhetorical Criticism Novels and Arguments: Inventing Rhetorical Criticism by Zahava Karl McKeon (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1982. viii + 260 pp. Thomas Conley Thomas Conley Department of Speech Communication, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Rhetorica (1983) 1 (2): 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1983.1.2.93 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Thomas Conley; Novels and Arguments: Inventing Rhetorical Criticism. Rhetorica 1 November 1983; 1 (2): 93–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1983.1.2.93 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentRhetorica Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1983, The International Society for the History of Rhetoric1983 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.