Abstract
This article narrates the experience of rhetoric and composition faculty developing a graduate program at a growing state university in south Texas. The narrative emphasizes the contextual constraints that required “institutional critique” and rhetorical negotiations. The second part of the article argues for a critical stance on how we talk about program development more generally. I use critical theory to engage the contradictions inherent in institutional work and in our own discourses, in order to argue that while we navigate institutional constraints, we must remain "dialectically ambivalent" about the larger implications of the work we do.
- Journal
- Composition Forum
- Published
- 2011
- CompPile
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026Navigating platform algorithms: Global south feminist activists’ rhetorical and composition practices in digital advocacy on social media ↗Kalpana Shrestha
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026Legacies, commitments, and new challenges: The Sweetland Digital Rhetoric Collaborative interviews three generations of Computers and Composition editors ↗Ali Alalem; Alyse Campbell; Thais Rodrigues Cons; Funmilola Fadairo; Nicole Koyuki Golden
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026How Baldwin's voice moved Cambridge: Activation contours, mimesis, and a computational approach to rhetoric's sensorium ↗David M. Rieder; Michael R. Jackson
-
Written Communication May 2026Rebecca Lorimer Leonard; Angela Rounsaville
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly May 2026Joe Edward Hatfield