Journal of Academic Writing Nov 2016 OA PDF

Engaging Tools for Dialogic Guidance in Higher Education

Randi Benedikte Brodersen University of Bergen ; Birger Solheim University of Bergen ; Pål Steiner University of Bergen ; Tina Torgersen Oftedal University of Bergen

Abstract

In this article we present a toolbox for dialogic guidance that we use at the Academic Writing Centre at the University of Bergen when guiding students in various stages of the writing process. Our guidance is dialogic which means that we acknowledge that meaning and learning evolve when we interact with one another, when different and divergent voices meet; we let students themselves explore their writing, their writing processes and their texts, and find their own answers, their own solutions and their own ways. We ask open-ended questions, listen, describe and provide tools that meet different needs at different stages of the writing process, instead of judging and ‘diagnosing’ the written texts - and the students - and then proposing a ‘treatment’. Examples of our tools are spontaneous writing, the academic pentagon and the Toulmin model of argumentation. We seek to strengthen the students’ understanding and awareness of their own writing, thereby improving not just the writing at hand, but also the students’ academic writing skills and learning in general, and to develop a reflective and accepting attitude. Our students engage in dialogues with us, the tools we present, with themselves, their texts and their writing, with fellow students, with previous bachelor and master theses, and with the tradition which they are part of.

Journal
Journal of Academic Writing
Published
2016-11-01
DOI
10.18552/joaw.v6i1.331
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Diamond
Topics
writing pedagogy argument writing centers
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. College Composition and Communication Sep 2025
    From an Unsettled Middle: A Critical-Ethical Stance for GenAI-Engaged Writing Assignments ↗
    Christopher Basgier; Lydia Wilkes
    first-year composition writing pedagogy writing across the curriculum argument writing centers artificial intelligence literacy studies
  2. College Composition and Communication Sep 2025
    From Cheating to Cheat Codes: Integrating Generative AI Ethics into Collaborative Learning ↗
    Kristi Girdharry
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism writing pedagogy argument collaborative writing writing centers artificial intelligence literacy studies
  3. The Peer Review Sep 2025
    The Impact of Working at a Writing Center in Brazil: Perspectives of Student Tutors ↗
    Ana Raquel Fialho Ferreira Campos; João Tiago Gaspar Cozechen; Elaine Pereira Lustosa; Marcos Angel De Carvalho Eing; Leonardo Schimiloski
    first-year composition writing pedagogy graduate education argument writing centers professional writing qualitative research artificial intelligence multilingual writers literacy studies race and writing
  4. The Peer Review Sep 2024
    Honor Consultant Safety: A Community Contract for Better Writing Center Ethics ↗
    Liz A. W. Thomae; Aleena A. Jacob
    rhetorical criticism decolonial rhetorics writing pedagogy argument collaborative writing writing centers peer tutoring archival research social media race and writing gender and writing disability studies affect and writing literary studies editorial matter
  5. The Peer Review Jan 2023
    Listening to Diverse Voices: A Liberatory Writing Pedagogy for Empowerment and Emancipation ↗
    writing pedagogy teacher development argument collaborative writing writing centers grammar and mechanics race and writing