Abstract

From an unsettled, ambivalent middle between discourses of generative AI integration and refusal, we offer a critical-ethical stance for AI-engaged writing assignments. We apply a critical thinking framework to these assignments, assert critical AI literacy as a kind of critical thinking, and discuss how critical thinking and critical AI literacy can facilitate ethical discernment about generative AI use. This unsettled, critical-ethical stance positions scholars in our field to support context-sensitive pedagogical responses to generative AI across first-year writing, Writing Across the Curriculum, writing centers, and beyond.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc202577162
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (10)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. Computers and Composition
Show all 10 →
  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. College English
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. How to Create High-Impact Writing Assignments that Enhance Learning and Development and R…
    Across the Disciplines  
  2. Addressing Artificial Intelligence Anxiety in Higher Education with Positive Framing
    AI Practitioner  
  3. Rhetoric, Technology, and the Virtues
  4. Assessing and Teaching What We Value: The Relationship Between College-Level Writing and …
    Assessing Writing  
  5. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
  6. A Middle Way for WAC: Writing to Engage
    The WAC Journal  
  7. Getting Specific about Critical Thinking: Implications for Writing Across the Curriculum
    The WAC Journal  
  8. The Routledge Handbook of Ethics in Technical and Professional Communication
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →