Computers and Composition Mar 2024 Open Access

Generative AI in first-year writing: An early analysis of affordances, limitations, and a framework for the future

Robert E. Cummings ; Stephen M. Monroe University of Mississippi ; Marc Watkins University of Mississippi

Abstract

Our First-year Writing program began intentional student engagements with generative AI in the fall of 2022. We developed assignments for brainstorming research questions, writing counterarguments, and editing assistance using the AI tools Elicit, Fermat, and Wordtune. Students felt that the tools were helpful for finding ideas to get started with writing, to find sources once they had started writing, and to get help with counterarguments and alternate word choices. But when given the choice to use the assistants or not, most declined. Generative AI at this stage is unreliable, and many students found the tradeoff in reviewing AI suggestions to be too time consuming. And many students expressed a preference for continuing to develop their own voices through writing. Our experience in engaging AI led to the creation of the DEER praxis, which emphasizes defined engagements with AI tools for specific purposes, and generous use of reflection.

Journal
Computers and Composition
Published
2024-03-01
DOI
10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102827
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
first-year composition multimodality artificial intelligence

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (15)

  1. McVey et al. (2026)
    Integrating generative AI in first-year writing: Lessons from a pilot initiative
    Computers and Composition
  2. Verhulsdonck et al. (2026)
    Expanding Human-in-the-Loop: Critical Sensemaking for Technical and Professiona…
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Saeli et al. (2026)
    Parallel Surveys of GenAI and Writing: Students’ Perspectives and Instructors’ …
    Written Communication
  4. Aguilar (2026)
    Increasing Literacy on the Scams Targeting Latines: Generative Artificial Intel…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Basgier et al. (2025)
    From an Unsettled Middle: A Critical-Ethical Stance for GenAI-Engaged Writing A…
    College Composition and Communication
Show all 15 →
  1. Gallagher et al. (2025)
    When collaborating turns into dishonesty: A data-driven heuristic comparing hum…
    Computers and Composition
  2. Walker (2025)
    Machine Learning’s Unintended Curriculum: The Impact of Large Language Models o…
    College English
  3. Sperber et al. (2025)
    Peer and AI Review + Reflection (PAIRR): A human-centered approach to formative…
    Computers and Composition
  4. Manierre et al. (2025)
    Coexisting with ChatGPT: Evaluating a tool for AI-based paper revision
    Computers and Composition
  5. Jiang et al. (2025)
    Augmenting User Experience Design with Multimodal Generative Artificial Intelli…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. Pandey et al. (2025)
    Large language models and digital multimodal composition in the first-year comp…
    Computers and Composition
  7. Colby (2025)
    Playing the digital dialectic game: Writing pedagogy with generative AI
    Computers and Composition
  8. Smith et al. (2025)
    Multimodal composing with generative AI: Examining preservice teachers’ process…
    Computers and Composition
  9. Jiang (2024)
    When generative artificial intelligence meets multimodal composition: Rethinkin…
    Computers and Composition
  10. Garib et al. (2024)
    DETECTing the anomalies: Exploring implications of qualitative research in iden…
    Computers and Composition

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Yancey et al. (2019)
    The Teaching for Transfer Curriculum: The Role of Concurrent Transfer and Insid…
    College Composition and Communication
  2. Hamilton (2019)
    Reflection(s) In/On Digital Writing’s Hybrid Pedagogy, 2010–2017
    Computers and Composition
  3. Shepherd (2018)
    Digital Writing, Multimodality, and Learning Transfer: Crafting Connections bet…
    Computers and Composition
  4. Lundin (2008)
    Teaching with Wikis: Toward a Networked Pedagogy
    Computers and Composition
  5. Yancey (1999)
    Looking Back as We Look Forward: Historicizing Writing Assessment
    College Composition and Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Chapman et al. (1995)
    Agents for change: Undergraduate writing programs in departments of English
    Rhetoric Review
Also cites 2 works outside this index ↓
  1. Dale (2021)
    The automated writing assistance landscape in 2021
    Natural Language Engineering  ↗
  2. Day (2012)
    The import of knowledge export: Connecting findings and theories of transfer of learning
    Educational Psychologist  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 52 View in citation network →

Related Articles

  1. Computers and Composition Mar 2025
    Large language models and digital multimodal composition in the first-year composition classrooms: An encroachment and/or enhancement dilemma ↗
    Hem Lal Pandey; Purna Chandra Bhusal; Sanjeev Niraula
    first-year composition multimodality artificial intelligence
  2. Teaching English in the Two-Year College Sep 2020
    Feature: Neither Here nor There: A Study of Dual Enrollment Students’ Hybrid Identities in First-Year Composition ↗
    Erin Costello Wecker; Patty Wilde
    first-year composition multimodality artificial intelligence
  3. Teaching English in the Two-Year College Sep 2020
    Feature: Finding Value, Building Value: A Dual Enrollment Model That Works ↗
    Joshua Stokdyk; Sarah Z. Johnson; Jen Grandone
    first-year composition multimodality artificial intelligence
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 2004
    The Million Dollar Letter: Some Hints on How to Write One ↗
    Marshall Myers
    first-year composition multimodality artificial intelligence technical communication voice and style
  5. Computers and Composition Jun 2026
    Integrating generative AI in first-year writing: Lessons from a pilot initiative ↗
    Christopher McVey; Pary Fassihi; Shuang Geng; Sarah Madsen Hardy; Matthew Parfitt
    first-year composition artificial intelligence