Written Communication Jan 2026

Parallel Surveys of GenAI and Writing: Students’ Perspectives and Instructors’ Perception of Student Perspectives in Writing-Intensive Courses

Hooman Saeli University of Tennessee at Knoxville ; Jeff Ringer University of Tennessee at Knoxville ; Chris Mayer University of Tennessee at Knoxville ; Matt Bryant Cheney University of Tennessee at Knoxville ; Grace Duncan University of Tennessee at Knoxville

Abstract

Our questionnaire-based study explored the perceptions and reported practices of students about using GenAI in writing-intensive (WI) courses and instructors’ perceptions of those student-held perceptions and reported practices. The data were collected from a large state university in the Southeastern United States. We administered two parallel versions of a questionnaire to 6,000 student emails and 390 instructor emails across two semesters. Using SPSS 29, we analyzed the data to calculate descriptive statistics, multivariate analyses of variance, post hoc analyses, and factor analyses. Our analysis revealed numerous significant differences between the students and instructors in how students use GenAI as a writing assistance tool and as a source of feedback, among others. Our results provide important insights into the divergent perspectives students and instructors hold about the role of GenAI in writing-intensive classes and recommend increased communication between instructors and students to achieve common understanding about GenAI’s applicability to writing processes.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883251372207
Open Access
Closed
Topics
writing across the curriculum

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Gallagher et al. (2024)
    Comparing Student and Writing Instructor Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty Whe…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Johnson-Eilola et al. (2024)
    Can Artificial Intelligence Robots Write Effective Instructions?
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Cummings et al. (2024)
    Generative AI in first-year writing: An early analysis of affordances, limitati…
    Computers and Composition
  4. Ringer et al. (2021)
    Posthumanizing Writing Transfer
    College English
  5. Donahue (2009)
    “Internationalization” and Composition Studies: Reorienting the Discourse
    College Composition and Communication
Show all 7 →
  1. Haas (1989)
    How the Writing Medium Shapes the Writing Process: Effects of Word Processing o…
    Research in the Teaching of English
  2. Emig (1977)
    Writing as a Mode of Learning
    College Composition and Communication
Also cites 32 works outside this index ↓
  1. Adams D. Chuah K.-M. Devadason E. Abdul Azzis M. S. (2024). From novice to navigator: Students’ academic help…
     ↗
  2. Al-Badi A. Khan A. Alotaibi E. (2022). Perceptions of learners and instructors towards artificial intelligenc…
     ↗
  3. 10.37514/PER-B.2021.1299
     ↗
  4. Baidoo-Anu D. Asamoah D. Amoako I. Mahama I. (2024). Exploring student perspectives on generative artificial …
     ↗
  5. 10.1093/oso/9780195388442.001.0001
     ↗
  6. Barrett A. Pack A. (2023). Not quite eye to A.I.: Student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative a…
     ↗
  7. 10.24052/IJHEM/V09N02/ART-6
     ↗
  8. 10.4159/9780674028845
     ↗
  9. Chauke T. A. Mkhize T. R. Methi L. Dlamini N. (2024). Postgraduate students’ perceptions on the benefits asso…
     ↗
  10. Chyung S. Y. Roberts K. Swanson I. Hankinson A. (2017). Evidence-based survey design: The use of a midpoint o…
     ↗
  11. Dai Y. (2024). Why students use or not use generative AI: Student conceptions concerns and implications for e…
     ↗
  12. Darvishi A. Khosravi H. Sadiq S. Gašević D. Siemens G. (2024). Impact of AI assistance on student agency. Com…
     ↗
  13. 10.37514/PER-B.2016.0810
     ↗
  14. 10.37514/INT-B.2022.1466
     ↗
  15. Kim N. J. Kim M. K. (2022). Teacher’s perceptions of using an artificial intelligence-based educational tool …
     ↗
  16. Kim N. J. Yu S. Detrick R. Li N. (2024). Exploring students’ perspectives on generative AI-assisted academic …
     ↗
  17. Koltovskaia S. Rahmati P. Saeli H. (2024). Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision: Beha…
     ↗
  18. Lee Y.-J. Davis R. O. Lee S. O. (2024). University students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence-based too…
     ↗
  19. Li B. Bao Y. (2023). A preliminary study on graduate student instructors’ exploration perception and use of C…
     ↗
  20. 10.1080/17501229.2023.2240316
     ↗
  21. McElroy S. J. Girdharry K. (2024). Ethics and AI assemblages: A heuristic analysis of undergraduate business …
     ↗
  22. Marshik T. McCracken C. Kopp B. O’Marrah M. (2024). Student and instructor perceptions and uses of artificial…
     ↗
  23. 10.1037/h0033601
     ↗
  24. Morris M. G. Venkatesh V. Ackerman P. L. (2005). Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new t…
     ↗
  25. 10.1007/978-3-031-72315-5_20
     ↗
  26. Pellas N. (2023). The effects of generative AI platforms on undergraduates’ narrative intelligence and writin…
     ↗
  27. 10.18665/sr.320892
     ↗
  28. Saenkhum T. Kim S. H. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence and second language writing. Journal of Seco…
     ↗
  29. Schei O. M. Møgelvang A. Ludvigsen K. (2024). Perceptions and use of AI chatbots among students in higher edu…
     ↗
  30. 10.37514/INT-B.2021.1428
     ↗
  31. Stöhr C. Ou W. Malmström H. (2024). Perceptions and usage of AI chatbots among students in higher education a…
     ↗
  32. 10.37514/PER-B.2012.0346
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →

Related Articles

  1. Written Communication Mar 2026
    Faculty and Administrator Perceptions of Interdisciplinary Collaborative Writing: Practices, Challenges, and Support Structures ↗
    Stephen Carradini; Ed Nagelhout
    writing across the curriculum
  2. Composition Forum Oct 2025
    Adding to the Qualitative Research Method Toolkit: Eliciting and Coding Participant Drawings ↗
    writing across the curriculum empirical research qualitative research multimodality multilingual writers
  3. Written Communication Oct 2025
    Gateways to a Different World of Meaning: Expanding Theme Use in Primary-Aged Children’s Writing ↗
    Frances Bodger
    writing across the curriculum multimodality multilingual writers
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Oct 2025
    One Size Does Not Fit All: How Clinical Pain Assessment Scales and Tools Mask Crip Narratives of Chronicity ↗
    Adrianna Deptula
    writing across the curriculum qualitative research multimodality
  5. College Composition and Communication Sep 2025
    From an Unsettled Middle: A Critical-Ethical Stance for GenAI-Engaged Writing Assignments ↗
    Christopher Basgier; Lydia Wilkes
    first-year composition writing centers writing across the curriculum artificial intelligence