Abstract

Important challenges faced by inexperienced academic writers include how to present an appropriate stance when commenting on their own research or on work by others, and how to successfully acknowledge and engage with readers’ needs, queries, and perspectives. This study investigated how well 22 new graduate writers from L1 and L2 backgrounds were able to convey stance and engagement in literature review assignments prepared for a graduate writing course. They claimed little or no prior knowledge in this skill area before taking part in 12–14 hours of instruction and practice where stance and engagement strategies were a core component before submitting reviews of approximately 1000 words. Analysis of post-instruction texts and students’ reflective comments revealed that students’ declarative knowledge had progressed, and that most were able to display an adequate or satisfactory level of proficiency in their writing. Based on these findings, I hypothesize a trajectory of stages of writers’ skill learning of stance and engagement strategies that acknowledges its complexities and the need for extensive practice to develop procedural skill. This proposed pathway makes explicit the fact that learning by novices is likely to progress incrementally, together with advances in their knowledge and self-confidence as academic writers and members of their disciplinary communities.

Journal
Writing and Pedagogy
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
10.3138/wap-28736-wette
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Writing and Pedagogy
  2. Writing and Pedagogy
  3. Journal of Writing Research
  4. Written Communication
Also cites 28 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/j.system.2019.02.010
    System  
  2. 10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001
    Journal of English for Academic Purposes  
  3. 10.1017/S0958344012000079
    ReCALL  
  4. 10.1177/0033688215609215
    RELC Journal  
  5. 10.1016/j.system.2017.06.010
    System  
  6. 10.1016/j.esp.2021.02.003
    English for Specific Purposes  
  7. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.007
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  8. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse
  9. 10.1093/applin/23.2.215
    Applied Linguistics  
  10. 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
    Journal of Second Language Writing  
  11. 10.1177/1461445605050365
    Discourse Studies  
  12. 10.1016/j.linged.2006.05.002
    Linguistics and Education  
  13. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.003
    Journal of English for Academic Purposes  
  14. Hyland, K. & Jiang, F. (2018). “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. E…
  15. 10.1111/ijal.12019
    International Journal of Applied Linguistics  
  16. Intercultural perspectives on research writing
  17. Lancaster, Z. (2014). Making stance explicit for second language writers in the disciplines: What faculty nee…
  18. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.006
    Journal of English for Academic Purposes  
  19. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.06.004
    Journal of Second Language Writing  
  20. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.01.001
    Journal of English for Academic Purposes  
  21. 10.1016/j.esp.2011.11.002
    English for Specific Purposes  
  22. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.09.003
    Journal of English for Academic Purposes  
  23. 10.1080/01425690124289
    British Journal of Sociology of Education  
  24. 10.1093/applin/22.1.58
    Applied Linguistics  
  25. Teaching writing for academic purposes to multilingual students: Instructional approaches
  26. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001
    Journal of English for Academic Purposes  
  27. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.001
    Journal of English for Academic Purposes  
  28. 10.1016/j.esp.2020.03.004
    English for Specific Purposes