Multimodal rhetorical analysis of Amnesty International’s website
Abstract
This article explores the rhetorical dimensions of the structure and selected contents of Amnesty International’s official website. The study is empirical in nature and considers current patterns of textual resources and visual affordances together with color applications and compositional design. It analyzes a sample of news reports, AI mission statement, vision and values together with topical icons, infographics, photographic and video materials. It illustrates the salient multimodal solutions in persuasive communication and evaluates the organization’s online rhetoric with respect to the persuasive potential to mobilize support and remediate its appeals in social media. It also applies the notion of newsworthiness to demonstrate how reports, visuals and posts are represented to arouse emotions (pathos), engender authenticity and appropriateness of actions (logos) and boost credibility (ethos).
- Journal
- Res Rhetorica
- Published
- 2018-10-04
- DOI
- 10.29107/rr2018.3.3
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- OA PDF Diamond
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
The Peer Review Sep 2021Russell Mayo; Russell Mayo; Elise Dixon; Eric Camarillorhetorical criticism cultural rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy two-year college teacher development argument collaborative writing assessment writing centers peer tutoring professional writing digital rhetoric multimodality social media online writing instruction race and writing disability studies editorial matter
-
Res Rhetorica Apr 2020Exploring Visual Framing Strategies, Sentiment, and Product Presentation Modality in Instagram Posts of Fashion Influencers ↗Gulnara Karimova
-
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2018Stephen J. McElroy
-
Technical Communication Quarterly Jan 2014Elise Verzosa Hurley; Amy C. Kimme Hea
-
Argumentation Feb 2026Keren Sadoun-Kerber