Equitable Poetics and the State of Conflict in Edmund Spenser’s Two Cantos of Mutabilitie
Abstract
This essay argues that Edmund Spenser’s legal poem, the Two Cantos of Mutabilitie, considers how civil conflicts implicitly generate a basis for their own evaluation and resolution. To illustrate this idea, Spenser draws from a tradition of rhetorical argumentation stretching from Aristotle and Cicero to Rudolph Agricola and Philip Sidney This tradition emphasizes how fictions establish the shared questions that can create a deliberative context for equitable judgment when general law and particular case come into conflict. Dramatizing this rational process through an allegorical legal trial, Spenser illuminates how divergent judgments and actions become ethically legible to one another as parts of the same deliberative whole.
- Journal
- Rhetorica
- Published
- 2014-09-01
- DOI
- 10.1353/rht.2014.0002
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 2022Shelton Weech
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Nov 2020Fielding Montgomery
-
Rhetorica Jan 2020Kathy Eden
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Nov 2019Michael William Pfau
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Nov 2019Nicholas Rynearson