Abstract

Abstract:This essay indicates how the implicit normative framework in the texts of Michel Foucault can lead to a poststructural rhetorical praxis that is neither relativistic nor unrealistically utopian. In relation to the Enlightenment project broadly conceived, Foucault's work in this area shows both similarities to and differences from Kant and Habermas. Some normative standards are precluded within Foucault's system, but others are implied and can be articulated. There is a concept of limit work in Foucault, and the essay concludes by explaining this concept and applying it to Philipp Jenninger's Kristallnacht address.

Journal
Rhetorica
Published
1996-05-01
DOI
10.1525/rh.1996.14.2.167
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

References (11)

  1. 10.1080/15295038909366740
    Critical Studies in Mass Communication  
  2. 10.1080/00335639409384084
    Quarteriy journal of Speech  
  3. Praxis International
  4. Praxis International
  5. Raritan
Show all 11 →
  1. 10.1177/026327688005004002
    Theory. Culture and Society  
  2. Philosophy and Rhetoric
  3. trans. Thomas Keenan, Philosophy and Social Criticism
  4. Liberation (
  5. 10.2307/2505224
  6. The American Historieal Rei'iew