Abstract

Recent decades have witnessed an increase in the practice of political apologies. This does not, however, mean that apologizing for their past human rights violations is easy for states. Political apology involves a number of complexities that urge the apologizing political authority to make argumentative maneuvers to manage or mitigate the challenges inherent in this activity type. This paper aims to set out the institutional constraints of political apology and characterize it as an argumentative activity type (AAT) by employing the four pragma-dialectical parameters: the initial situation, procedural and material starting points, argumentative means, and possible outcome (van Eemeren and Houtlosser 2002, 2005; van Eemeren 2010). In order to illustrate how the institutional preconditions and the characteristics of the activity type manifest themselves in an actual apology text, the paper presents an analysis of the 2022 apology delivered by the then-Prime Minister Mark Rutte for the Netherland’s role in slavery, focusing on his strategic maneuvers to justify the apology and increase its sincerity and sufficiency. The analysis of Rutte’s maneuvering with the topical potential, audience demand, and presentational devices reveals how he achieves a bold acknowledgement of wrongdoing, a clear and emphatic statement of apology, and indicates directions for recovery.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
10.1007/s10503-026-09697-0
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation
Also cites 25 works outside this index ↓
  1. Argumentation in political interviews: Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations …
  2. Andrieu, K. 2009. Sorry for the genocide’: How public apologies can help promote national reconciliation. Mil…
    Millennium: Journal of International Studies  
  3. Augoustinos, M., M. B. Hastie, and M. Wright. 2011. Apologizing for historical injustice: Emotion, truth and …
    Discourse & Society  
  4. Bentley, T. 2018. Colonial apologies and the problem of the transgressor speaking. Third World Quarterly 39 (…
    Third World Quarterly  
  5. Cels, S. 2015. Interpreting political apologies: The neglected role of performance. Political Psychology 36 (…
    Political Psychology  
  6. Chun, J. 2015. Beyond ‘dissatisfaction’ and ‘apology fatigue’: Four types of Japanese official apology. Pacif…
    Pacific Focus  
  7. Cowden, R. G., E. L. Worthington, S. Joynt, and C. Jakins. 2018. Do congruent apologies facilitate forgivenes…
    South African Journal of Psychology  
  8. Demir, Y. 2016. Maneuvering strategically in a press conference to diminish political responsibility for a cr…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  
  9. Demir, Y., and J. Schaafsma. 2023. Argumentative strategies to evade state apologies: The Turkish example. Di…
    Discourse Studies  
  10. Entman, R.M. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51…
    Journal of Communication  
  11. Garssen, B. 2022. The argumentative style of the opening speech of a debate in the European Parliament. Journ…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  
  12. Forgiveness: A philosophical exploration
  13. Harris, S., K. Grainger, and L. Mullany. 2006. The pragmatics of political apologies. Discourse & Society 17 …
    Discourse & Society  
  14. Hernández, A. 2021. Journalists’ moves in political press conferences and their implications for accountabili…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  
  15. Kampf, Z. 2009. Public (non-) apologies: The discourse of minimizing responsibility. Journal of Pragmatics 41…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  16. Labrie, N., A. Akkermans, and D. Hample. 2020. A dutch dose of dissent. Exploring the role of gender, educati…
    Journal of Argumentation in Context  
  17. Argumentation in prime minister’s question time: Accusation of inconsistency in response …
  18. Páez, D., M. Bobowik, and J.H. Liu. 2010. Official or political apologies and improvement of intergroup relat…
    Revista de Psicología Social  
  19. Reijven, M.H. 2024. So i know how to do this": The prototypical argumentative pattern in U.S.A. presidential …
    Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict  
  20. Schaafsma, J., M. Zoodsma, and T. Sagherian-Dickey. 2021. Closing chapters of the past? Rhetorical strategies…
    Journal of Human Rights  
  21. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma- dialectical theor…
  22. van Eemeren, F.H., and B. Garssen. 2023. A functional diversity of argumentative styles. Discourse Studies 25…
    Discourse Studies  
  23. van Eemeren, F.H., and P. Houtlosser. 2002. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Maintaining a d…
  24. Zoodsma, M., and J. Schaafsma. 2021. Examining the ‘age of apology’: Insights from the political apology data…
    Journal of Peace Research  
  25. Zoodsma, M., J. Schaafsma, T. Sagherian-Dickey, and J. Friedrich. 2021. These are not just words. A cross- Na…
    International Review of Social Psychology