Abstract

Abstract This essay explores synecdoche as an extended argumentative structure in Roman defenses of rhetoric. While contemporary scholarship often limits synecdoche to semantic substitution or distinguishes it from metonymy, theorists have recognized its potential as a form of argument. In Roman rhetoric, Quintilian describes synecdoche as both a trope of part-whole relations and a parallel argumentative form in Institutio Oratoria with comparable aims and lexical choices. This study examines how Roman rhetoricians, notably Quintilian and Cicero, employed synecdoche in extended arguments in defense of rhetoric. These arguments structured interconnected ideas such as categorical distinctions, hierarchical significance, and temporal sequence by employing synecdochal structures. By comparing ancient definitions and examples, this analysis reveals synecdoche’s capacity to organize complex argumentative discourse, offering a lens to scrutinize its structural and functional role.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2025-10-30
DOI
10.1007/s10503-025-09679-8
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Rhetoric Review
Show all 6 →
  1. Rhetorica
Also cites 15 works outside this index ↓
  1. Chrzanowska-Kluczewska, E. 2013. Synecdoche–an underestimated macrofigure? Language and Literature 22(3):233–247.
    Language and Literature  
  2. Cicero, M. T. 1949. Topica (H. M. Hubbell, Trans). Harvard University Press.
  3. Cicero, M. T. 2001. Cicero on the ideal orator (De Oratore), ed. J. M. May, and J. Wisse. Oxford University Press.
  4. Edelstein, L. 1967. The Idea of progress in classical antiquity. Johns Hopkins University.
  5. Fahnestock, J. 2004. Figures of argument. Informal Logic 24(2):115–135.
  6. Fahnestock, J. 2023. Quintilian on Effective Language. The Oxford Handbook of Quintilian, ed. Marc van der Po…
  7. Mangano, F. 2015. Cicero’s list of topics from antiquity to the early middle ages. Revista española De filoso…
    Revista española De filosofía Medieval  
  8. Manilius. 1977. Astronomica. Edited and translated by G. P. Goold. Loeb Classical Library 469. Harvard Univer…
  9. Nerlich, B. 2010. Synecdoche: A trope, a whole trope, and nothing but a trope. Tropical truth (s): The episte…
  10. Oldenburg, C. 2015. Re characterizing the anecdote: Synecdoche and Ethotic argument in presidential debate rh…
    Communication Studies  
  11. Preller, L. 1852. Die vorstellungen der Alten besonders der Griechen von dem ursprunge und Den ältesten Schic…
    Philologus  
  12. Seto, K. I. 1999. Distinguishing metonymy from synecdoche. In Metonymy in Language and thought, ed. Klaus-Uwe…
  13. Van der Poel, Edwards and Murphy. 2023. Introduction. The Oxford Handbook of Quintilian, ed. Marc van der Poe…
  14. West, M. L. 1965. Tryphon de tropis. The Classical Quarterly 15(2):230–248.
    The Classical Quarterly  
  15. Zinsmaier, T. 2021. Quintilian as Master of Prose. The Oxford Handbook of Quintilian, ed. Marc van der Poel, …