Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (40) · 3 in this index
-
Almagro, M., and S. Guerra. 2023. There’s a Certain Slant of Light: Three Attitudes Toward the Political Turn…Metaphilosophy ↗
-
Almagro, M., and N. Villanueva. 2023. Disagreeing with Experts. International Journal of Philosophical Studie…International Journal of Philosophical Studies ↗
-
Almagro, M., I.R. Hannikainen, and N. Villanueva. 2022. Whose Words Hurt? Contextual Determinants of Offensiv…Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin ↗
-
Experimental Philosophy of Language: Perspectives, Methods, and Prospects
-
How to do Things with Words
Show all 40 →
-
Ayala, S. 2016. Speech Affordances: A Structural Take on how Much we can do With our Words. European Journal …European Journal of Philosophy ↗
-
Ayala, S. 2018. A Structural Explanation of Injustice in Conversations: It’s About Norms. Pacific Philosophic…Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
-
The Politics of Language
-
Bloch, H.A. 2002. The Controversy Over the University Multicultural Curriculum During the 1980s. Revista Cana…Revista Canaria De Estudios Ingleses
-
Camp, E. 2006. Metaphor and That Certain ‘Je Ne Sais Quoi.’ Philosophical Studies 129: 1–25.Philosophical Studies ↗
-
Camp, E. 2013. Slurring Perspectives. Analytic Philosophy 54 (3): 330–349.Analytic Philosophy ↗
-
The Scientific Imagination
-
Cepollaro, B., A. Soria-Ruiz and I. Stojanovic. 2021. The semantics and pragmatics of value judgments. In The…
-
Introduction to logic
-
Copi, I. M., and C. Cohen. 1998. Introduction to logic, 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall
-
Crary, Alice. 2018. The methodological is political: What’s the matter with ‘analytic feminism’? Radical Phil…Radical Philosophy
-
Fasoli, F., A. Carnaghi, and M.P. Paladino. 2015. Social acceptability of sexist derogatory and sexist object…Language Science ↗
-
Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing
-
Gibson, J.L., L. Epstein, and G.P. Magarian. 2019. Taming uncivil discourse. Political Psychology 41: 383–401.Political Psychology ↗
-
Argumentation
-
Non-Ideal Foundations of Language
-
Argumentation
-
Kukla, R. 2014. Performative force, convention, and discursive injustice. Hypatia 29 (2): 440–457.Hypatia ↗
-
Langton, R. 1993. Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts. Philosophy & public affairs, 293–330.
-
Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications
-
Mill, John S. 2009. On Liberty and The Subjection of Women. London: Penguin. (Original work published in 1859.)
-
Mills, Charles W. 2005. ‘Ideal Theory’ as Ideology. Hypatia 20 (3): 165–184.Hypatia
-
Morris Engel, S. 1994. The Five Forms of the Ad Hominem Fallacy. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Discip…Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines ↗
-
Mühlebach, D. 2022. Non-ideal philosophy of language. Inquiry 67 (10): 4018–4040. https://doi.org/10.1080/002…Inquiry ↗
-
Mühlebach, D. 2023. A non-ideal approach to slurs. Synthese 202 (97): 1–25.Synthese
-
Pinedo, Manuel, and Neftalí Villanueva. 2022. Epistemic De-Platforming. In The Political Turn in Analytic Phi…
-
Ruiz, Roberto. 2018. Poisoning the Well. In Bad Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Fallacies in Western Phi…
-
Man made language
-
How propaganda works
-
Stevens, K. 2022. Silence at the Meta-Level: A Story about Argumentative Cruelty. Philosophy and Rhetoric 55 …Philosophy and Rhetoric
-
Speech and harm: Controversies over free speech
-
The lewd, the rude and the nasty: A study of thick concepts in ethics
-
Ad Hominem Arguments
-
Argumentation
-
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1953/2001). Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.