Argumentation Aug 2010

Poisoning the Well and Epistemic Privilege

Ben Kotzee Birkbeck, University of London
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2010-08-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-010-9181-8
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Holgado et al. (2025)
    Against the Neutral View of Poisoning the Well
    Argumentation
  2. Hundleby (2023)
    Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias
    Argumentation
  3. Linker (2014)
    Epistemic Privilege and Expertise in the Context of Meta-debate
    Argumentation

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Walton (2006)
    Poisoning the Well
    Argumentation
Also cites 5 works outside this index ↓
  1. L Alcoff (2006)
    Identity politics reconsidered
     ↗
  2. M Fricker (1999)
    Fricker, M. 1999. Epistemic oppression and epistemic privilege. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. suppl 25: 191–210.
    Canadian Journal of Philosophy, suppl.  ↗
  3. VS Harrison (2007)
    Harrison, V.S. 2007. Feminist philosophy of religion and the problem of epistemic privilege. Heythrop Journal…
    Heythrop Journal  ↗
  4. HE Longino (1993)
    Longino, H.E. 1993. Feminist standpoint theory and the problems of knowledge. Signs 19 (1): 201–212.
    Signs  ↗
  5. FH Eemeren Van (1984)
    Speech acts in argumentative discussions
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network → Build reading path →