Argumentation Jun 2024 Open Access

Some Benefits and Limitations of Modern Argument Map Representation

Charles Rathkopf Forschungszentrum Jülich

Abstract

AbstractArgument maps represent some arguments more effectively than others. The goal of this article is to account for that variability, so that those who wish to use argument maps can do so with more foresight. I begin by identifying four properties of argument maps that make them useful tools for evaluating arguments. Then, I discuss four types of argument that are difficult to map well: reductio ad absurdum arguments, charges of equivocation, logical analogies, and mathematical arguments. The difficulties presented by these four types appear unrelated to one another, but I show that, in each case, the difficulty can be traced back to the use of metalinguistic reasoning. The need to represent a transition between object language and metalanguage can undermine one or more of the benefits that argument map representation would otherwise confer.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2024-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-023-09626-5
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (17) · 1 in this index

  1. C Bailey (1926)
    Epicurus, the extant remains
  2. M Beardsley (1966)
    Thinking straight
  3. S Cullen (2018)
    Cullen, S., J. Fan, E. Brugge, and A. Elga. 2018. Improving analytical reasoning and argument understanding: …
    NPJ Science of Learning  ↗
  4. C Dutilh Novaes (2016)
    Dutilh Novaes, C. 2016. Reductio ad absurdum from a dialogical perspective. Philosophical Studies 173 (10): 2…
    Philosophical Studies  ↗
  5. HJ Gensler (1986)
    Gensler, H.J. 1986. A Kantian argument against abortion. Philosophical Studies 49 (1): 83–98.
    Philosophical Studies  ↗
Show all 17 →
  1. HP Grice (1989)
    Studies in the way of words
  2. M Harrell (2011)
    Harrell, M. 2011. Argument diagramming and critical thinking in introductory philosophy. Higher Education Res…
    Higher Education Research & Development  ↗
  3. M Harrell (2015)
    Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education
     ↗
  4. D Jacquette (2011)
    Jacquette, D. 2011. Enhancing the diagramming method in informal logic. Argument: Biannual Philosophical Jour…
    Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal
  5. Juthe (2009)
    Refutation by Parallel Argument
    Argumentation
  6. MF Smith (2001)
    Lucretius, on the nature of things
  7. SN Thomas (1996)
    Practical reasoning in natural language
  8. S Toulmin (1958)
    The uses of argumentation
  9. van der Brugge, E. 2018. The Use of Argument Mapping in Improving Critical Thinking. PhD thesis, University o…
  10. Weisstein, E.W. 2020. Arborescence. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Arborescence.html.
  11. B Wilson (1988)
    Wilson, B. 1988. On a Kantian argument against abortion. Philosophical Studies 53 (1): 119–130.
    Philosophical Studies  ↗
  12. JM Wolfe (2004)
    Wolfe, J.M., and T.S. Horowitz. 2004. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do the…
    Nature Reviews Neuroscience  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network → Build reading path →