Refutation by Parallel Argument

André Juthe Uppsala University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2009-04-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-008-9109-8
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. Argumentation
Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. Brown, W.R. 1995. The domain constraint on analogy and analogical argument. Informal Logic 17(1): 89–100.
    Informal Logic  
  2. Cargile, J. 1997. On the burden of proof. Philosophy 72: 59–83.
    Philosophy  
  3. Facione, P. 1976. Counterexamples and where they lead. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 36: 523–530.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  
  4. Govier, T. 1989. Analogies and missing premises. Informal Logic 11(3): 141–152.
    Informal Logic  
  5. Guarini, M. 2004. A defence of non-deductive reconstructions of analogical arguments. Informal Logic 24(2): 1…
    Informal Logic  
  6. Levvis, G.W. 1991. The principle of relevant similarity. Journal of Value Inquiry 25: 81–87.
    Journal of Value Inquiry  
  7. Levvis, M.A. 1992. The roots of relevant similarity. Journal of Value Inquiry 26: 289–291.
    Journal of Value Inquiry  
  8. McGee, V. 1985. A counterexample to Modus Ponens. The Journal of Philosophy 82(9): 462–471.
    The Journal of Philosophy  
  9. Waller, B.N. 2001. Classifying and analyzing analogies. Informal Logic 21(3): 199–218.
    Informal Logic  
  10. Wilson, Bryan. 1988. On a Kantian argument against abortion. Philosophical Studies 53(1): 119–130.
    Philosophical Studies