Refutation by Parallel Argument

André Juthe Uppsala University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2009-04-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-008-9109-8
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation

References (43) · 5 in this index

  1. Barker, S.F. 1989. Analogy in Hume’s DIALOGUES. Informal Logic XI(3): 173–184.
    Informal Logic
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Brown, W.R. 1995. The domain constraint on analogy and analogical argument. Informal Logic 17(1): 89–100.
    Informal Logic  
  5. Cargile, J. 1997. On the burden of proof. Philosophy 72: 59–83.
    Philosophy  
Show all 43 →
  1. Principles of philosophical reasoning
  2. The dialogue of reason—an analysis of analytical philosophy
  3. Introduction to logic
  4. Informal logic
  5. Attacking faulty reasoning—a practical guide to fallacy-free arguments
  6. Analogical reasoning—perspectives of artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and philosophy
  7. Facione, P. 1976. Counterexamples and where they lead. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 36: 523–530.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  
  8. Fieser, James. 2006. The probability argument for the existence of God and Alien Pyramid Builders. http://www…
  9. Govier, T. 1985. Logical analogies. Informal Logic VII(1): 26–33.
    Informal Logic
  10. Govier, T. 1989. Analogies and missing premises. Informal Logic 11(3): 141–152.
    Informal Logic  
  11. Guarini, M. 2004. A defence of non-deductive reconstructions of analogical arguments. Informal Logic 24(2): 1…
    Informal Logic  
  12. The generalizability of critical thinking: Multiple perspectives of an educational ideal
  13. A direct realist account of perceptual awareness
  14. Argumentation
  15. Argumentation
  16. Kilhbom, U. 2002. Ethical particularism, an essay on moral reasons. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis, Stock…
  17. Krabbe, Erik. 1996. Can we ever pin one down to a formal fallacy? In Logic and argumentation, ed. Johan van B…
  18. Levvis, G.W. 1991. The principle of relevant similarity. Journal of Value Inquiry 25: 81–87.
    Journal of Value Inquiry  
  19. Levvis, M.A. 1992. The roots of relevant similarity. Journal of Value Inquiry 26: 289–291.
    Journal of Value Inquiry  
  20. The miracle of theism
  21. McGee, V. 1985. A counterexample to Modus Ponens. The Journal of Philosophy 82(9): 462–471.
    The Journal of Philosophy  
  22. Principles of philosophical reasoning
  23. Sider, Ted. 2008. Metaphysics. http://tedsider.org/teaching/415/HO_dualism.pdf (viewed 080519).
  24. Reason, science and paradox
  25. Smith, J.W. 1988. Essays on ultimate questions: Critical discussions of the limits of contemporary philosophi…
  26. Theron, S. 1997. Argument forms and argument from analogy. Acta Philosophica 6(2): 303–326.
    Acta Philosophica
  27. Thomson, J.J. 1971. A defense of abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 47–66.
    Philosophy and Public Affairs
  28. Waller, B.N. 2001. Classifying and analyzing analogies. Informal Logic 21(3): 199–218.
    Informal Logic  
  29. Walton, D.N. 1988. Burden of proof. Argumentation 2: 233–254.
    Argumentation
  30. Informal logic—a handbook for critical argumentation
  31. Walton, D.N. 1992. Types of dialogue, dialectical shifts and fallacies. In Argumentation illuminated, ed. F.H…
  32. Walton, D. 1993. Commitment, types of dialogue, and fallacies. Informal Logic XIV(2&3): 93–103.
    Informal Logic
  33. Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning
  34. Arguments from ignorance
  35. Commitment in dialogue—basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning
  36. Argumentation
  37. Wilson, Bryan. 1988. On a Kantian argument against abortion. Philosophical Studies 53(1): 119–130.
    Philosophical Studies  
  38. Woods, J., and B. Hudak. 1989. By parity of reasoning. Informal Logic XI(3): 125–139.
    Informal Logic