Apples Ergo Oranges: The Argumentative Use of Comparisons

José Alhambra Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to distinguish some varieties of what I call ‘comparison argumentation.’ This way of arguing consists of supporting a claim about one thing on the basis of a comparison of that thing with another. The criteria that I use are the subject, the degree, and the purpose of the comparison. I do not intend to be exhaustive, but to address two specific questions: what sets arguments by analogy apart within this category and, from there, how they can be evaluated based on their distinctive features. An important aspect of my approach is the analysis of cases. I have selected a relatively large corpus of examples, mainly from the news media, and will analyse them based on argumentative connectors and other conventional indicators of comparisons.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
10.1007/s10503-025-09673-0
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
Also cites 24 works outside this index ↓
  1. Alhambra, José. 2022. Argumentation by Analogy and Weighing of Reasons. Informal Logic, 42(4): 749-785. https…
  2. Bader, Ralf M.. 2016. Conditions, modifiers and holism. In Weighing reasons, ed. E. Lord and B. Maguire, 27–…
  3. Bermejo-Luque, Lilian. 2014. Deduction without Dogmas: The Case of Moral Analogical Argumentation. Informal L…
  4. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2003. Participant objectivation. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9 (2): 281–294.
    Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute  
  5. Brewer, Scott. 1996. Exemplary reasoning: Semantics, pragmatics, and the rational force of legal argument by …
    Harvard Law Review  
  6. Doury, Marianne. 2009. Argument schemes typologies in practice: The case of comparative arguments. In Ponder…
  7. Garssen, Bart, and Manfred Kienpointner. 2011. Figurative analogy in political argumentation. In Keeping in …
  8. Govier, Trudy. 1985. Logical analogies. Informal Logic 7(1):27–33.
    Informal Logic  
  9. Govier, Trudy. 1989. Analogies and missing premises. Informal Logic 11 (3): 141–152.
    Informal Logic  
  10. Guarini, Marcello. 2004. A defence of non-deductive reconstructions of analogical arguments. Informal Logic 2…
    Informal Logic  
  11. Guarini, Marcello, Amy Butchart, Simard Smith, Paul, and Andrei Moldovan. 2009. Resources for research on ana…
    Informal Logic  
  12. Juthe, André. 2014. A Systematic Review of Classifications of Arguments by Analogy. H. J. Ribeiro (ed.) Syste…
  13. Juthe, André. 2019. “A Defense of Analogy Inference as Sui Generis”. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 29(1): 259-309.
  14. Kienpointner, Manfred. 2012. When figurative analogies fail: Fallacious uses of arguments from analogy. In T…
  15. Marraud, Hubert. 2014. Argumentos a fortiori. Theoria 29 (1): 99–112.
    Theoria  
  16. Argument dialectics: The place of reasons in logic
  17. Mayes, Gregory R.. 2010. Argument explanation complementarity and the structure of informal reasoning. Inform…
    Informal Logic  
  18. Shecaira, Fábio.P. 2013. Analogical arguments in ethics and law: A defence of a deductivist analysis. Informa…
    Informal Logic  
  19. Text representation. Linguistic and pscycholinguistic aspects
  20. The uses of argument
  21. van Eemeren, Frans H. , Grootendorst, Rob, and Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca. 2002. Argumentation. Analysis,…
  22. Systematic approaches to argument by analogy
  23. Waller, Bruce. 2001. Classifying and analyzing analogies. Informal Logic 21 (3): 199–218.
    Informal Logic  
  24. Woods, John and Brent Hudak. 1989. By parity of reasoning. Informal Logic 11(3):125–139.
    Informal Logic