Journal
Argumentation
Published
2022-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-021-09565-z
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric

References (18) · 2 in this index

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Aikin, Scott. 2017. Fallacy theory, the negativity problem, and minimal dialectical adversariality. Cogency 9…
    Cogency
  3. Aikin, Scott, and John Casey. 2016. Straw men, iron men and argumentative virtue. Topoi 35: 431–440.
    Topoi  
  4. Bondy, Patrick. 2010. Argumentative injustice. Informal Logic 30 (3): 263–278.
    Informal Logic  
  5. ISSA 9 Conference Proceedings
Show all 18 →
  1. Govier, Trudy. 1987. A new approach to charity. In Problems in Argument Evaluation and Analysis, 133–158. Dor…
  2. Govier, Trudy 1999. The philosophy of argument. Vale, VA: Newport News.
  3. Hazlett, Allan. 2020. Critical injustice. American Philosophical Quarterly 57 (2): 129–144.
    American Philosophical Quarterly  
  4. Hundleby, Catherine. 2010. The authority of the fallacies approach to argument evaluation. Informal Logic 30:…
    Informal Logic  
  5. Hundleby, Catherine. 2013. Aggression, politeness, and abstract adversaries. Informal Logic 33: 238–262.
    Informal Logic  
  6. Argumentation
  7. Mitchell, J. Wagemans (eds.) 2020. Adversariality and argumentation. Informal Logic 40(1): 77-108
  8. Dislocating cultures: Identities, traditions, and third world feminism
  9. Rooney, Phyllis. 2010. Philosophy, adversarial argumentation, and embattled reason. Informal Logic 30: 203–234.
    Informal Logic
  10. Rooney, Phyllis. 2012. When philosophical argumentation impedes social and political progress. Journal of Soc…
    Journal of Social Philosophy  
  11. Sherman, Benjamin. 2016. There’s no (testimonial) justice: Why pursuit of a virtue is not the solution to epi…
    Social Epistemology  
  12. Stevens, Katharina. 2021. Charity for moral reasons? – A defense of the principle of charity in argumentation…
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  13. Informal logic: A pragmatic approach