Abstract

Research Article| September 01 2011 A Defense of War and Sport Metaphors in Argument Scott Aikin Scott Aikin Philosophy Department, Vanderbilt University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2011) 44 (3): 250–272. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.3.0250 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Scott Aikin; A Defense of War and Sport Metaphors in Argument. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 September 2011; 44 (3): 250–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.3.0250 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2011 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved.2011The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2011-09-01
DOI
10.5325/philrhet.44.3.0250
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation
  4. Philosophy & Rhetoric

References (20) · 1 in this index

  1. Aikin, Scott F. 2008. “Perelmanian Universal Audience and the Epistemic Aspirations of Argument.” Philosophy …
  2. Aikin, Scott F. 2010. “A Self-Defeat Problem for the Rhetorical Theory of Argument.” In Argument Cutlures (CD…
  3. Ayim, Maryann. 1988. “Violence and Domination as Metaphors in Academic Discourse.” In Selected Issues in Logi…
  4. Baumeister, Roy. 1999. Evil: Inside Human Violence and Cruelty. New York: Barnes and Noble.
  5. Cohen, Daniel. 2004. Arguments and Metaphors in Philosophy. New York: University Press of America.
Show all 20 →
  1. Edmonds, Jeff. 2008. “Power and Pure Experience: Metaphysics of Education.” PhD diss., Vanderbilt University.
  2. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Peter Houtlosser. 2002. “Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof.” In Advan…
  3. Foss, Sonja, and Cindy L. Griffin. 1995. “Beyond Persuasion: A Proposal for an Invitational Rhetoric.” Commun…
  4. Fulkerson, Bill. 1996. “Transcending Our Conception of Argument in Light of Feminist Critiques.” Argumentatio…
  5. Gilbert, Michael. 1994. “Feminism, Argumentation, and Coalescence.” Informal Logic 16 (2): 95–113.
  6. Graham, Jeffrey. 2005. “Rumsfeld Under Fire on the Hill.” Washington Post, 24 June, http://www.washingtonpost…
  7. Govier, Trudy. 1999. The Philosophy of Argument. Newport News, VA: Vale.
  8. James, William. 1997. “The Will to Believe.” In The Writings of William James: A Comprehensive Edition, ed. J…
  9. Krabbe, Erik C. W. 1999. “Response to Ralph H. Johnson's ‘More on Arguers and Dialectical Obligations.’” In A…
  10. Krabbe, Erik C. W. 2001. “Strategies in Dialectic and Rhetoric.” In Argumentation and Its Applications (CD-RO…
  11. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  12. Moultin, Janice. 1983. “A Paradigm of Philosophy: The Adversary Method.” In Discovering Reality, ed. Sandra H…
  13. Rooney, Phyllis. 2003. “Feminism and Argumentation.” In IL at 25 (CD-ROM Proceedings of the 2003 Meeting of t…
  14. Tindale, Christopher. 1999. Acts of Arguing. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  15. Argumentation