Abstract

AbstractIn this paper, I highlight the significance of practices of refutation in philosophical inquiry, that is, practices of showing that a claim, person or theory is wrong. I present and contrast two prominent approaches to philosophical refutation: refutation in ancient Greek dialectic (elenchus), in its Socratic variant as described in Plato’s dialogues, and as described in Aristotle’s logical texts; and the practice of providing counterexamples to putative definitions familiar from twentieth century analytic philosophy, focusing on the so-called Gettier problem. Moreover, I discuss Lakatos’ method of proofs and refutations, as it offers insightful observations on the dynamics between arguments, refutations, and counterexamples. Overall, I argue that dialectic, in particular in its Socratic variant, is especially suitable for the philosophical purpose of questioning the obvious, as it invites reflection on one’s own doxastic commitments and on the tensions and inconsistencies within one’s set of beliefs. By contrast, the counterexample-based approach to philosophical refutation can give rise to philosophical theorizing that is overly focused on hairsplitting disputes, thus becoming alienated from the relevant human experiences. Insofar as philosophical inquiry treads the fine line between questioning the obvious while still seeking to say something significant about human experiences, perhaps a certain amount of what Lakatos describes as ‘monster-barring’—a rejection of overly fanciful, artificial putative counterexamples—has its place in philosophical argumentation.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2022-12-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-022-09583-5
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (49) · 1 in this index

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Analytic philosophy: A very short introduction
  3. Callard, A. 2019. Is philosophy fight club? The point magazine. https://thepointmag.com/examined-life/is-phil…
  4. Acts of knowledge: History, philosophy and logic
  5. Castelnérac, B., and M. Marion. 2013. Antilogic. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Co…
    The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication  
Show all 49 →
  1. Chappell, S.-G. 2019. Plato on knowledge in the theaetetus. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://p…
  2. Theory of knowledge
  3. Cohen, D.H. 1995. Argument is War...and War is Hell: Philosophy, education, and metaphors for argumentation. …
    Informal Logic  
  4. Duncombe, M., and C. DutilhNovaes. 2016. Dialectic and logic in Aristotle and his tradition. History and Phil…
    History and Philosophy of Logic  
  5. Dutant, J. 2015. The legend of the justified true belief analysis. Philosophical Perspectives 29(1): 95–145. …
    Philosophical Perspectives  
  6. Dutilh Novaes, C. 2016. Reductio ad absurdum from a dialogical perspective. Philosophical Studies 173: 2605–2628.
    Philosophical Studies  
  7. Dutilh Novaes, C. 2019. The human factor: Doing philosophy in a messy world by asking inconvenient questions.…
  8. Polarisation, arrogance, and dogmatism: Philosophical perspectives
  9. The dialogical roots of deduction
  10. Dutilh Novaes, C. 2021. Who’s afraid of adversariality? Conflict and cooperation in argumentation. Topoi 40(5…
    Topoi  
  11. Innovations in the history of analytical philosophy
  12. The development of dialectic from Plato to Aristotle
  13. Gendler, T.S., and J. Hawthorne. 2005. The real guide to fake barns: A catalogue of gifts for your epistemic …
    Philosophical Studies  
  14. Gettier, E.L. 1963. Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis 23(6): 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/anal…
    Analysis  
  15. Goldman, A.I. 1976. Discrimination and perceptual knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy 73(20): 771. https://d…
    The Journal of Philosophy  
  16. Hundleby, C. 2021. Feminist perspectives on argumentation. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://pl…
  17. Ichikawa, J. J., & M. Steup. 2018. The analysis of knowledge. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https:/…
  18. Plato on the value of philosophy
  19. Polarisation, arrogance, and dogmatism: Philosophical perspectives
  20. Kirk, A. 2020. Euler’s polyhedron formula. Plus Magazine. https://plus.maths.org/content/eulers-polyhedron-formula.
  21. Lakatos’ philosophy of mathematics: A historical approach
  22. Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery
  23. Larvor, B. 2001. What is dialectical philosophy of mathematics? Philosophia Mathematica 9: 212–229.
    Philosophia Mathematica  
  24. Does Socrates have a method?
  25. Leslie, S.-J., & A. Lerner. 2016. Generic generalizations. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://pl…
  26. Matthews, G. 2009. Whatever became of the socratic elenchus? Philosophical analysis in Plato. Philosophy Comp…
    Philosophy Compass  
  27. On liberty
  28. Moss, J. 2007. The doctor and the pastry chef; pleasure and persuasion in Plato’s Gorgias. Ancient Philosophy…
    Ancient Philosophy  
  29. Discovering reality
  30. Musgrave, A., & C. Pigden. 2016. Imre Lakatos. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford…
  31. In Defense of common sense: Lorenzo Valla’s humanist critique of scholastic philosophy
  32. Nehamas, A. 1990. Eristic, antilogic, sophistic, dialectic: Plato’s demarcation of philosophy from sophistry.…
    History of Philosophy Quarterly
  33. Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge
  34. Epistemic luck
  35. The midwife of platonism: Text and subtext in Plato’s theaetetus
  36. Aristotle’s topics—Books I and VIII
  37. Strevens, M. 2021. The knowledge machine: How irrationality created modern science. Penguin Books.
  38. Tanswell, F. S. 2017. Proof, rigour & informality: A virtue account of mathematical knowledge. PhD Dissertati…
  39. Tanswell, F.S. 2018. Conceptual engineering for mathematical concepts. Inquiry 61: 881–913.
    Inquiry  
  40. A companion to experimental philosophy
  41. Weinberg, J. M. 2016. Intuitions. In Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology, eds. H. Cappelen, T. S. Ge…
  42. Knowledge and its limits
  43. Williamson, T. 2005. Armchair philosophy, metaphysical modality and counterfactual thinking. Proceedings of t…
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (hardback)  
  44. Zagzebski, L. 1994. The inescapability of Gettier problems. The Philosophical Quarterly 44(174): 65. https://…
    The Philosophical Quarterly