Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (2)
-
Argumentation
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Also cites 19 works outside this index ↓
-
Intelligent Virtue
-
Casey, J. 2020. Adversariality and argumentation. Informal Log 40 (1): 77–108.Informal Log ↗
-
Cohen, D.H. 2013b. Virtue context. Informal Log 33 (4): 471–485.Informal Log ↗
-
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
-
Gregg, A.P., and N. Mahadevan. 2014. Intellectual arrogance and intellectual humility: An evolutionary-episte…Journal of Psychology and Theology ↗
-
Hample, D. 2007. The Arguers. Informal Log 27 (2): 163–178.Informal Log ↗
-
Hornikx, J., and U. Hahn. 2012. Reasoning and argumentation: Towards an integrated psychology of argumentatio…Think Reasoning ↗
-
Hundleby, C. 2013. Aggression, politeness, and abstract adversaries. Informal Log 33 (2): 238–262.Informal Log ↗
-
Jackson, S., and S. Jacobs. 1980. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Th…The Quarterly Journal of Speech ↗
-
Kidd, I.J. 2016. Intellectual humility, confidence, and argumentation. Topoi 35 (2): 395–402.Topoi ↗
-
Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. The Behaviora…The Behavioral and Brain Sciences ↗
-
The Enigma of Reason
-
Nagel, T. 1974. What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review 83 (4): 435–450.Philosophical Review ↗
-
Novaes, C.D. 2013. A dialogical account of deductive reasoning as a case study for how culture shapes cogniti…J Cognit Cult ↗
-
Novaes, C.D. 2016. Reductio ad absurdum from a dialogical perspective. Philosophical Studies 173 (10): 2605–2628.Philosophical Studies ↗
-
Novaes, C.D. 2018. The enduring enigma of reason. Mind & Language 33 (5): 513–524.Mind & Language ↗
-
Rooney, P. 2012. When philosophical argumentation Impedes social and political progress. Journal of Social Ph…Journal of Social Philosophy ↗
-
Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discuss…
-
The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument