Objective Evaluation of Demonstrative Arguments

Emmanuel Trouche Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ; Jing Shao École Pratique des Hautes Études ; Hugo Mercier Laboratoire sur le Langage, le Cerveau et la Cognition
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2019-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-018-9472-z
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (42) · 1 in this index

  1. Bialek, M., and G. Pennycook. 2017. The cognitive reflection test is robust to multiple exposures. Behavior R…
    Behavior Research Methods  
  2. Brem, S.K., and L.J. Rips. 2000. Explanation and evidence in informal argument. Cognitive Science 24: 573–604.
    Cognitive Science  
  3. Capaldi, C. 2017. Graduating from undergrads: Are Mechanical Turk workers more attentive than undergraduate p…
  4. Choi, I., R.E. Nisbett, and A. Norenzayan. 1999. Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universali…
    Psychological Bulletin  
  5. Corner, A., and U. Hahn. 2009. Evaluating science arguments: Evidence, uncertainty, and argument strength. Jo…
    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Show all 42 →
  1. Corner, A., U. Hahn, and M. Oaksford. 2011. The psychological mechanism of the slippery slope argument. Journ…
    Journal of Memory and Language  
  2. Edwards, K., and E.E. Smith. 1996. A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personal…
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  
  3. Frederick, S. 2005. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (4): 25–42.
    Journal of Economic Perspectives  
  4. Psychological foundations of attitudes
  5. Hahn, U., A.J.L. Harris, and A. Corner. 2009. Argument content and argument source: An exploration. Informal …
    Informal Logic  
  6. Hahn, U., and J. Hornikx. 2016. A normative framework for argument quality: Argumentation schemes with a Baye…
    Synthese  
  7. Hahn, U., and M. Oaksford. 2007. The rationality of informal argumentation: A Bayesian approach to reasoning …
    Psychological Review  
  8. Hahn, U., M. Oaksford, and H. Bayindir. 2005. How convinced should we be by negative evidence? In Proceedings…
  9. Harris, A.J., U. Hahn, J.K. Madsen, and A.S. Hsu. 2015. The appeal to expert opinion: Quantitative support fo…
    Cognitive Science  
  10. Hoeken, H., E. Šorm, and P.J. Schellens. 2014. Arguing about the likelihood of consequences: Laypeople’s crit…
    Thinking & Reasoning  
  11. Hoeken, H., R. Timmers, and P.J. Schellens. 2012. Arguing about desirable consequences: What constitutes a co…
    Thinking & Reasoning  
  12. Argumentation
  13. Hornikx, J., and U. Hahn. 2012. Reasoning and argumentation: Towards an integrated psychology of argumentatio…
    Thinking & Reasoning  
  14. Klaczynski, P.A., and D.H. Gordon. 1996. Self-serving influences on adolescents’ evaluations of belief-releva…
    Journal of Experimental Child Psychology  
  15. Koriat, A., S. Lichtenstein, and B. Fischhoff. 1980. Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psycholo…
    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory and Cognition
  16. Kuhn, D., and J. Lao. 1996. Effects of evidence on attitudes: Is polarization the norm? Psychological Science…
    Psychological Science  
  17. Kunda, Z. 1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108: 480–498.
    Psychological Bulletin  
  18. Group problem solving
  19. Laughlin, P.R., and A.L. Ellis. 1986. Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intell…
    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology  
  20. Levesque, H.J. 1986. Making believers out of computers. Artificial Intelligence 30 (1): 81–108.
    Artificial Intelligence  
  21. Mata, A., M.B. Ferreira, and S.J. Sherman. 2013. The metacognitive advantage of deliberative thinkers: A dual…
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  
  22. Cognitive illusions
  23. Mercier, H. 2016b. The argumentative theory: Predictions and empirical evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences…
    Trends in Cognitive Sciences  
  24. Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral an…
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences  
  25. The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning
  26. Moshman, D., and M. Geil. 1998. Collaborative reasoning: Evidence for collective rationality. Thinking & Reas…
    Thinking & Reasoning  
  27. Munro, G.D., P.H. Ditto, L.K. Lockhart, A. Fagerlin, M. Gready, and E. Peterson. 2002. Biased assimilation of…
    Basic and Applied Social Psychology  
  28. The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently…and why
  29. Norenzayan, A., E.E. Smith, B.J. Kim, and R.E. Nisbett. 2002. Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitiv…
    Cognitive Science  
  30. Oaksford, M., and U. Hahn. 2004. A Bayesian approach to the argument from ignorance. Canadian Journal of Expe…
    Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology  
  31. Petty, R.E., and J.T. Cacioppo. 1979. Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing mess…
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  
  32. The handbook of social psychology
  33. Rips, L.J. 2001. Two kinds of reasoning. Psychological Science 12: 129–134.
    Psychological Science  
  34. Taber, C.S., and M. Lodge. 2006. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journa…
    American Journal of Political Science  
  35. Advances in experimental social psychology
  36. The Cambridge handbook of consumer psychology
  37. Trouche, E., E. Sander, and H. Mercier. 2014. Arguments, more than confidence, explain the good performance o…
    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General