Toulmin’s Logical Types

David Botting Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2017-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-016-9414-6
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation

References (12)

  1. Language, truth and logic
  2. Botting, D. 2014. Reasons why arguments and explanations are different. Proceedings of the 8th ISSA Conferenc…
  3. Castañeda, H.N. 1960. On a proposed revolution in logic. Philosophy of Science 27(3): 279–292.
    Philosophy of Science  
  4. Fundamentals of argumentation theory
  5. Hamby, B. 2012. Toulmin’s “analytic argument”. Informal Logic 32(1): 116–131.
    Informal Logic  
Show all 12 →
  1. Hempel, C.G., and P. Oppenheim. 1948. Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science 15(2): 135–175.
    Philosophy of Science  
  2. Holth, P. 2001. The persistence of category mistakes in psychology. Behavior and Philosophy 29: 203–219.
    Behavior and Philosophy
  3. von Mises, R. 1956. Positivism: A Study in Human Understanding. U.S.A: G. Braziller.
  4. Experience and prediction
  5. Ryle, G. 1938. Categories. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 38: 189–206.
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society  
  6. Salmon, W. 1981. Rational prediction. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32(2): 115–125.
    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science  
  7. The uses of argument