Toulmin’s Logical Types

David Botting Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2017-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-016-9414-6
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 5 works outside this index ↓
  1. Castañeda, H.N. 1960. On a proposed revolution in logic. Philosophy of Science 27(3): 279–292.
    Philosophy of Science  
  2. Hamby, B. 2012. Toulmin’s “analytic argument”. Informal Logic 32(1): 116–131.
    Informal Logic  
  3. Hempel, C.G., and P. Oppenheim. 1948. Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science 15(2): 135–175.
    Philosophy of Science  
  4. Ryle, G. 1938. Categories. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 38: 189–206.
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society  
  5. Salmon, W. 1981. Rational prediction. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32(2): 115–125.
    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science