Abstract

Giving Reasons has the ambition of developing a new theoretical approach to argumentation that integrates logical, dialectical and rhetorical aspects. The author uses speech act theory to realize her ideal of 'a linguistic-pragmatic approach' to argumentation. After a severe criticism of the major existing approaches to the study of argumentation, the author develops what she claims to be ''a systematic and comprehensive theory of the interpretation, analysis and evaluation of arguments.''

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2012-05-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-011-9258-z
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 5 works outside this index ↓
  1. Biro, J., and H. Siegel. 2011. Argumentation, arguing, and arguments: Comments on Giving Reasons. Theoria 72:…
    Theoria  
  2. Eemeren, F.H. van., and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. A theoretical model …
  3. Freeman, J.B. 2011. The logical dimension of argumentation and its semantic appraisal in Bermejo-Luque’s Givi…
    Theoria  
  4. Hitchcock, D. 2011. Arguing as trying to show that a target-claim is correct. Theoria 72: 301–309.
    Theoria  
  5. Pinto, R.C. 2011. The account of warrants in Bermejo-Luque’s Giving Reasons. Theoria 72: 311–320.
    Theoria