The Gospel of Matthew as a Literary Argument

Mika Hietanen University of Amsterdam

Abstract

Through an argumentation analysis can one show how it is feasible to view a narrative religious text such as the Gospel of Matthew as a literary argument. The Gospel is not just “good news” but an elaborate argument for the standpoint that Jesus is the Son of God, the Messiah. It is shown why an argumentation analysis needs to be supplemented with a pragmatic literary analysis in order to describe how the evangelist presents his story so as to reach his argumentative objective. The analysis also shows why in the case of historical religious literary texts, certain demands are put on the analyst that are not normally present.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2011-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-010-9198-z
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (29)

  1. Aland, K. et al., ed. 1993. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.
  2. Aristotle, 1994. The ‘Art’ of rhetoric (trans: Freese, J.H.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  3. Story and discourse: narrative structure in fiction and film
  4. Dickson, J.P. 2005. Gospel as news: ευαγγελ—from Aristophanes to the Apostle Paul. New Testament Studies 51:2…
  5. France, R.T. 1990 [1985]. The Gospel according to Matthew: An introduction and commentary (Tyndale New testam…
Show all 29 →
  1. Syntax and semantics III: Speech acts.
  2. Studies in the way of words
  3. Hietanen, M. 2007a. Paul’s argumentation in galatians: A pragma-dialectical analysis (Library of New Testamen…
  4. Hietanen, M. 2007b. The Gospel of Matthew as an argument. In Proceedings of the sixth conference of the inter…
  5. Howell, D.B. 1990. Matthew’s inclusive story: A study in the narrative rhetoric of the first gospel (Journal …
  6. Jefferson, G., H. Sacks, and E. Schegloff. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking f…
    Language  
  7. Kennedy, G.A. 1984. New Testament interpretation through rhetorical criticism (Studies in Religion). Chapel H…
  8. Kingsbury, J.D. 1988. Matthew as story. 2nd rev. edn. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
  9. Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose
  10. Liftin, D. 1994. St. Paul’s theology of proclamation: 1 Corinthians 1–4 and Greco-Roman Rhetoric (Journal for…
  11. Louw, J.P., and E. Nida, eds. 1999. Greek–English lexicon of the New Testament based on semantic domains. Uni…
  12. Luz, U. 1985. Das Evangelium nach Matt häus (Mt 1–7) (Evangelisch-Katholischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament,…
  13. Luz, U. 1989. Matthew 8–20: A commentary (Hermeneia). Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
  14. Luz, U. 2005. Studies in Matthew (trans: Selle, R.). Grand Rapids, Mich & Cambridge: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
  15. New Revised Standard Version Bible: Anglicized Edition. 1995. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  16. Toward a speech act theory of literary discourse
  17. Russell, B. 1927. Why i am not a Christian. URL: http://users.drew.edu/∼jlenz/whynot.html . Accessed 20 June 2007.
  18. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language
  19. Language, mind and knowledge
  20. Searle, L. 2005. New criticism. In The John Hopkins guide to literary theory, 2nd edn, ed. M. Groden, M. Krei…
  21. van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model f…
  22. van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. Hillsdale, NJ: Law…
  23. Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contempora…
  24. Argumentation: analysis, evaluation, presentation