Message Framing, Normative Advocacy and Persuasive Success

Adam Corner Cardiff University ; Ulrike Hahn Cardiff University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2010-05-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-009-9159-6
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (34) · 2 in this index

  1. A primer of probability logic
  2. Corner, A., U. Hahn, and M. Oaksford. 2006. The Slippery slope argument: Probability, utility and category bo…
  3. Studies in the way of words
  4. Hahn, U., and M. Oaksford. 2006a. A Bayesian approach to informal reasoning fallacies. Synthese 152 (2): 207–237.
    Synthese  
  5. Hahn, U., and M. Oaksford. 2006b. Why a normative theory of argument strength and why might one want it to be…
    Informal Logic  
Show all 34 →
  1. Hahn, U., and M. Oaksford. 2007. The rationality of informal argumentation: A Bayesian approach to reasoning …
    Psychological Review  
  2. Argumentation
  3. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases
  4. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision making under risk. Econometrica …
    Econometrica  
  5. Kuhberger, A. 1998. The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and…
    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes  
  6. Levin, I.P., S.L. Schneider, and G.J. Gaeth. 1998. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical …
    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes  
  7. McKenzie, C.R.M., and J.D. Nelson. 2003. What a speaker’s choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame se…
    Psychonomic Bulletin and Review  
  8. Mckenzie, C.R.M., M. Liersch, and R. Finklestein. 2006. Recommendations implicit in policy defaults. Psycholo…
    Psychological Science  
  9. Moxey, A., D. O’Connell, P. McGettigan, and D. Henry. 2003. Describing treatment effects to patients: How the…
    Journal of General Internal Medicine  
  10. Oaksford, M., and N. Chater. 1994. A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psych…
    Psychological Review  
  11. Proceedings of the third ISSA conference on argumentation, vol. 1: Perspectives and approaches
  12. O’Keefe, D.J. 1997a. Standpoint explicitness and persuasive effect: A meta-analytic review of the effects of …
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  13. O’Keefe, D.J. 1997b. Justification explicitness and persuasive effect: A meta-analytic review of the effects …
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  14. Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation
  15. Selected papers from the thirteenth NCA/AFA conference on argumentation
  16. Argumentation
  17. O’Keefe, D.J., and J.D. Jensen. 2007. The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for…
    Journal of Health Communication  
  18. Priester, J.R., and R.E. Petty. 1995. Source attributions and persuasion: perceived honesty as a determinant …
    Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin  
  19. Rothman, A.J., R.D. Bartels, J. Wlaschin, and P. Salovey. 2006. The strategic use of gain-and loss-framed mes…
    Journal of Communication  
  20. Rothman, A.J., and P. Salovey. 1997. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behaviour: The role of message f…
    Psychological Bulletin  
  21. Semin, G.R., and C.J. De Poot. 1997. Bringing partiality to light: Question wording and choice as indicators …
    Social Cognition  
  22. Sher, S., and C.R.M. McKenzie. 2006. Information leakage from logically equivalent frames. Cognition 101: 467–494.
    Cognition  
  23. The encyclopedia of language and linguistics
  24. Stalnaker, R. 1975. Indicative conditionals. Philosophia 5: 269–286.
    Philosophia  
  25. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211 (4481)…
    Science  
  26. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1986. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business 59: 251–278.
    Journal of Business  
  27. A systematic theory of argumentation—the pragma-dialectical approach
  28. Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation
  29. Argument: The logic of the fallacies