Message Framing, Normative Advocacy and Persuasive Success

Adam Corner Cardiff University ; Ulrike Hahn Cardiff University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2010-05-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-009-9159-6
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
Also cites 23 works outside this index ↓
  1. Hahn, U., and M. Oaksford. 2006a. A Bayesian approach to informal reasoning fallacies. Synthese 152 (2): 207–237.
    Synthese  
  2. Hahn, U., and M. Oaksford. 2006b. Why a normative theory of argument strength and why might one want it to be…
    Informal Logic  
  3. Hahn, U., and M. Oaksford. 2007. The rationality of informal argumentation: A Bayesian approach to reasoning …
    Psychological Review  
  4. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases
  5. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision making under risk. Econometrica …
    Econometrica  
  6. Kuhberger, A. 1998. The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and…
    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes  
  7. Levin, I.P., S.L. Schneider, and G.J. Gaeth. 1998. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical …
    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes  
  8. McKenzie, C.R.M., and J.D. Nelson. 2003. What a speaker’s choice of frame reveals: Reference points, frame se…
    Psychonomic Bulletin and Review  
  9. Mckenzie, C.R.M., M. Liersch, and R. Finklestein. 2006. Recommendations implicit in policy defaults. Psycholo…
    Psychological Science  
  10. Moxey, A., D. O’Connell, P. McGettigan, and D. Henry. 2003. Describing treatment effects to patients: How the…
    Journal of General Internal Medicine  
  11. Oaksford, M., and N. Chater. 1994. A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psych…
    Psychological Review  
  12. O’Keefe, D.J. 1997a. Standpoint explicitness and persuasive effect: A meta-analytic review of the effects of …
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  13. O’Keefe, D.J. 1997b. Justification explicitness and persuasive effect: A meta-analytic review of the effects …
    Argumentation and Advocacy  
  14. O’Keefe, D.J., and J.D. Jensen. 2007. The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for…
    Journal of Health Communication  
  15. Priester, J.R., and R.E. Petty. 1995. Source attributions and persuasion: perceived honesty as a determinant …
    Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin  
  16. Rothman, A.J., R.D. Bartels, J. Wlaschin, and P. Salovey. 2006. The strategic use of gain-and loss-framed mes…
    Journal of Communication  
  17. Rothman, A.J., and P. Salovey. 1997. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behaviour: The role of message f…
    Psychological Bulletin  
  18. Semin, G.R., and C.J. De Poot. 1997. Bringing partiality to light: Question wording and choice as indicators …
    Social Cognition  
  19. Sher, S., and C.R.M. McKenzie. 2006. Information leakage from logically equivalent frames. Cognition 101: 467–494.
    Cognition  
  20. Stalnaker, R. 1975. Indicative conditionals. Philosophia 5: 269–286.
    Philosophia  
  21. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211 (4481)…
    Science  
  22. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1986. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business 59: 251–278.
    Journal of Business  
  23. Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation