Argumentation Mar 2009

Interpreting Perelman’s Universal Audience: Gross versus Crosswhite

Charlotte Jørgensen University of Copenhagen
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2009-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-008-9117-8
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Gross (2019)
    Misunderstanding the Universal Audience
    Advances in the History of Rhetoric
  2. Sigler (2015)
    The New Rhetoric’s Concept of Universal Audience, Misconceived
    Argumentation

References (18) · 1 in this index

  1. J Arthos (2004)
    Arthos, J. 2004. Almost speaking a new rhetoric: the strangeness of the text of La Nouvelle Rhétorique. South…
    Southern Communication Journal  ↗
  2. W Brockriede (1960)
    Brockriede, W., and D. Ehninger. 1960. Toulmin on argument: an interpretation and application. Quarterly Jour…
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  ↗
  3. J Crosswhite (1989)
    Crosswhite, J. 1989. Universality in rhetoric: Perelman’s universal audience. Philosophy and Rhetoric 22: 157–173.
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  4. Crosswhite (1993)
    Being unreasonable: Perelman and the problem of fallacies
    Argumentation
  5. J Crosswhite (1995)
    Crosswhite, J. 1995. Is there an audience for this argument? Fallacies, theories, and relativisms. Philosophy…
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
Show all 18 →
  1. J Crosswhite (1996)
    The rhetoric of reason: writing and the attractions of argument
  2. R Graff (2006)
    Graff, R., and W. Winn. 2006. Presencing “Communion” in Chaïm Perelman’s new rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetori…
    Philosophy and Rhetoric  ↗
  3. A Gross (1999)
    Gross, A. 1999. A theory of the rhetorical audience: reflections on Chaim Perelman. Quarterly Journal of Spee…
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  ↗
  4. AG Gross (2003)
    Chaim Perelman
  5. Jørgensen, C. 2003. The Mytilene debate: a paradigm for deliberative rhetoric, In Proceedings of the Fifth Co…
  6. DS Levi (1995)
    Levi, D.S. 1995. In defense of rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric 28: 253–275.
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  7. C Perelman (1968)
    Perelman, C. 1968. Rhetoric and philosophy. Philosophy and Rhetoric 1: 15–24.
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  8. Perelman, C. 1982. The realm of rhetoric, trans. William Kluback. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
  9. C Perelman (1984)
    Perelman, C. 1984. The new rhetoric and the rhetoricians: remembrances and comments. Quarterly Journal of Spe…
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  ↗
  10. Perelman, Ch., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation, trans. J. Wilkin…
  11. CW Tindale (1999)
    Acts of arguing: a rhetorical model of argument
  12. CW Tindale (2004)
    Rhetorical argumentation: principles of theory and practice
     ↗
  13. FH Eemeren van (1995)
    van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1995. Perelman and the fallacies. Philosophy and Rhetoric 28: 122–133.
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
CrossRef global citation count: 9 View in citation network → Build reading path →