The New Rhetoric’s Concept of Universal Audience, Misconceived

J. E. Sigler Purdue University West Lafayette
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2015-08-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-015-9349-3
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

References (19) · 5 in this index

  1. Aikin, Scott F. 2008. Perelmanian universal audience and the epistemic aspirations of audience. Philosophy an…
    Philosophy and Rhetoric  
  2. Crosswhite, James. 1989. Universality in rhetoric: Perelman’s universal audience. Philosophy and Rhetoric 22(…
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  3. Crosswhite, James. 1995. Is there an audience for this argument? Fallacies, theories, and relativisms. Philos…
    Philosophy and Rhetoric
  4. Crosswhite, James. 2010. Universalities. Philosophy and Rhetoric 43(4): 430–448.
    Philosophy and Rhetoric  
  5. Argumentation
Show all 19 →
  1. Gross, Alan. 1999. A theory of the rhetorical audience: Reflections on Chaim Perelman. Quarterly Journal of S…
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  2. Validity and rhetoric in philosophical argument
  3. Argumentation
  4. Argumentation
  5. The realm of rhetoric
  6. Perelman, Chaïm. 1984. The new rhetoric and the rhetoricians: Remembrances and comments. Quarterly Journal of…
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  7. Perelman, Chaïm. 2007. The new rhetoric: A theory of practical reasoning. In The rhetoric of Western thought …
  8. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation
  9. Ray, John W. 1978. Perelman’s universal audience. Quarterly Journal of Speech 64(4): 361–375.
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  10. Argumentation
  11. Tindale, Christopher W. 2010. Ways of being reasonable: Perelman and the philosophers. Philosophy and Rhetori…
    Philosophy and Rhetoric  
  12. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  13. The uses of argument
  14. van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1995. Perelman and the fallacies. Philosophy and Rhetoric 28(2):…
    Philosophy and Rhetoric