Abstract

This paper aims at creating an adequate theoretical basis for a systematic integration of institutional insights into the pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentative exchanges that occur in institutionalised contexts. The argumentative practice of Prime Minister’s Question Time in the British House of Commons is examined, as a case in point, in order to illustrate how the knowledge of the characteristics of an institution, its rules and conventions can be integrated into the pragma-dialectical analysis. The paper highlights the role that theoretical concepts and tools such as strategic manoeuvring, argumentative activity types and dialectical profiles play in this integration.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2008-08-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-008-9090-2
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: a theoretical model for the analysis of discuss…
  2. Eemeren, F.H. van, and P. Houtlosser. 1999. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studi…
    Discourse Studies  
  3. Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
  4. Eemeren, F.H. van, and P. Houtlosser. 2007b. Kinship: The relationship between Johnstone’s ideas about philos…
    Philosophy & rhetoric  
  5. Eemeren, F.H. van, and P. Houtlosser. 2007c. The study of argumentation as normative pragmatics. Pragmatics a…
    Pragmatics and Cognition  
  6. Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study