Dima Mohammed

4 articles
University of Amsterdam ORCID: 0000-0003-1322-6597

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

  1. Standing Standpoints and Argumentative Associates: What is at Stake in a Public Political Argument?
    doi:10.1007/s10503-018-9473-y
  2. Goals in Argumentation: A Proposal for the Analysis and Evaluation of Public Political Arguments
    doi:10.1007/s10503-015-9370-6
  3. Institutional Insights for Analysing Strategic Manoeuvring in the British Prime Minister’s Question Time
    Abstract

    This paper aims at creating an adequate theoretical basis for a systematic integration of institutional insights into the pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentative exchanges that occur in institutionalised contexts. The argumentative practice of Prime Minister’s Question Time in the British House of Commons is examined, as a case in point, in order to illustrate how the knowledge of the characteristics of an institution, its rules and conventions can be integrated into the pragma-dialectical analysis. The paper highlights the role that theoretical concepts and tools such as strategic manoeuvring, argumentative activity types and dialectical profiles play in this integration.

    doi:10.1007/s10503-008-9090-2
  4. Comments on ‘Nonfallacious Rhetorical Strategies: Lyndon Johnson’s Daisy Ad’
    doi:10.1007/s10503-007-9025-3