Argumentation Nov 2005

The Logic of Analogy in the Law

Jaap Hage Maastricht University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2005-11-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-005-0506-y
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Canale et al. (2010)
    What is the Reason for This Rule? An Inferential Account of the Ratio Legis
    Argumentation

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. K. D. Ashley (1991)
    10.1016/0020-7373(91)90011-U
    International Journal of Man-Machine Studies  ↗
  2. L. K. Branting (1991)
    ‘Reasoning with Portions of Precedents’. Proceedings of the Third International Conferenc…
     ↗
  3. J. C. Hage (2001a)
    ‘Formalizing Legal Coherence’, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Artific…
     ↗
  4. J. C. Hage (2001b)
    Pluralism and Law
     ↗
  5. J. C. Hage (2003)
    10.1177/1023263X0301000104
    Maastricht Journal of Eoropean and Comparative Law 10, nr.  ↗
  6. U. Klug (1982)
    Juristische Logik
     ↗
  7. H. Prakken (1997)
    Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law
     ↗
  8. H. Prakken (1998)
    10.1023/A:1008278309945
    Artificial Intelligence and Law 6, nos.  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 9 View in citation network → Build reading path →