Abstract

Research Article| January 01 2009 Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories Fabrizio Macagno; Fabrizio Macagno Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Douglas Walton Douglas Walton Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2009) 42 (2): 154–182. https://doi.org/10.2307/25655348 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton; Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2009; 42 (2): 154–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/25655348 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2009 The Pennsylvania State University2009The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2009-01-01
DOI
10.2307/25655348
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (38) · 3 in this index

  1. Argumentation
  2. Alexy, Robert. 1989. A theory of legal argumentation: The theory of rational discourse as theory of legaljust…
  3. Aristotle. 1851. On rhetoric.Tv&ns.T. Buckley. London: Henry G. Bohn.
  4. -. 1939. Topica. Trans. E. S. Forster. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  5. -. 1984. Prior analytics. In The complete works of Aristotle, ed. Jonathan Barnes, 39-113. Princeton, N.J.: P…
Show all 38 →
  1. Ashley, Kevin. 1991. Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals in hypo. International Journal of Man-Machine Stu…
  2. Brewer, Scott. 1996. Exemplary reasoning: Semantics, pragmatics, and the rational force of legal argument by …
  3. Brüninghaus, Stefanie, and Kevin Ashley. 2003a. Predicting outcomes of case-based legal arguments. In Proceed…
  4. -. 2003b. A predictive role for intermediate legal concepts. In Proceedings 16th annual conference on legal k…
  5. Burbidge, John. 1990. Within reason: A guide to non deductive reasoning. Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press.
  6. Cederblom, Jerry, and David Paulsen. 1982. Critical reasoning. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.
  7. Cicero. 1949. De Inventione, De Optimo genere oraturum, Topica. Trans. H. Hubbell. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard …
  8. Copi, Irving, and Keith Burgess-Jackson. 1992. Informal logic. New York: MacMillan.
  9. Goldschmidt, Victor. 1947. Le Paradigme dans la dialectique platonicienne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  10. Govier, Trudy. 1989. Analogies and missing premises. Informal Logic 11 (3): 141-52.
  11. Guarini, Marcello. 2004. A defence of non-deductive reconstructions of analogical arguments. Informal Logic 2…
  12. Argumentation
  13. Hastings, Arthur. 1962. A reformulation of the modes of reasoning in argumentation. Ph.D. diss., Northwestern…
  14. Johnson, Ralph, and Anthony Blair. 1983. Logical self defence. Toronto: McGraw-Hill.
  15. Argumentation
  16. Kienpointner, Manfred. 1992. Alltagslogik: Struktur und Funktion von Argumentations- mustern. Stuttgart: From…
  17. Klug, Ulrich. 1951. Juristische Logik. Berlin: Springer.
  18. Leake, David. 1996. Case-based reasoning: Experiences, lessons, and future directions. In Case-based reasonin…
  19. Lindahl, Lars. 2003. Operative and justificatory grounds in legal argumentation. Associations 7(1): 185-200.
  20. Little, Frederick, Leo Groarke, and Christopher Tindale. 1989. Good reasoning matters! Toronto: McClelland an…
  21. Manicas, Peter, and Arthur Kruger. 1968. Essentials of logic. New York: American Book Company.
  22. Mill, John Stuart. 1959 . A system of logic. London: Longmans.
  23. Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame,…
  24. Plato. 1990. Sophist. Trans. William Cobb. Savage, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
  25. Posner, Richard. 2006. Reasoning by analogy. Cornell Law Review 761:761-74.
  26. Rigotti, Eddo, and Sara Greco. 2006. Topics: The argument generator. Universitä della Svizzera Italiana, www.…
  27. Waller, Bruce. 2001. Classifying and analyzing analogies. Informal Logic 21 (3): 199-218.
  28. Walton, Douglas. 1996. Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  29. -. 2006. Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge Universi…
  31. Weinreb, Lloyd. 2005. Legal reason: The use of analogy in legal argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Weitzenfeld, Julian. 1984. Valid reasoning by analogy. Philosophy of Science 51:137-49.
  33. Whately, Richard. 1859. Elements of logic. London: Longmans, Green &. Co.