Abstract

Research Article| January 01 2009 Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories Fabrizio Macagno; Fabrizio Macagno Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Douglas Walton Douglas Walton Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Philosophy & Rhetoric (2009) 42 (2): 154–182. https://doi.org/10.2307/25655348 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton; Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 January 2009; 42 (2): 154–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/25655348 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All Scholarly Publishing CollectivePenn State University PressPhilosophy & Rhetoric Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2009 The Pennsylvania State University2009The Pennsylvania State University Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Journal
Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published
2009-01-01
DOI
10.2307/25655348
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 14 works outside this index ↓
  1. Adler, Jonathan. 2007. Asymmetrical analogical arguments. Argumentation 21 (1): 83-92.
  2. Ashley, Kevin. 1991. Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals in hypo. International Journal of Man-Machine Stu…
  3. Brewer, Scott. 1996. Exemplary reasoning: Semantics, pragmatics, and the rational force of legal argument by …
  4. Brüninghaus, Stefanie, and Kevin Ashley. 2003a. Predicting outcomes of case-based legal arguments. In Proceed…
  5. Cicero. 1949. De Inventione, De Optimo genere oraturum, Topica. Trans. H. Hubbell. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard …
  6. Govier, Trudy. 1989. Analogies and missing premises. Informal Logic 11 (3): 141-52.
  7. Guarini, Marcello. 2004. A defence of non-deductive reconstructions of analogical arguments. Informal Logic 2…
  8. Hage, Jaap. 2005. The logic of analogy in the law. Argumentation 19 (4): 401-15.
  9. Juthe, Andre. 2005. Argument by analogy. Argumentation 19 (1): 1-27.
  10. Klug, Ulrich. 1951. Juristische Logik. Berlin: Springer.
  11. Waller, Bruce. 2001. Classifying and analyzing analogies. Informal Logic 21 (3): 199-218.
  12. Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge Universi…
  13. Weinreb, Lloyd. 2005. Legal reason: The use of analogy in legal argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Weitzenfeld, Julian. 1984. Valid reasoning by analogy. Philosophy of Science 51:137-49.
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →