Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Background:</b> Twitter offers tools that facilitate the diffusion of information by which companies can engage consumers to share their messages. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Literature review:</b> Communication professionals are using platforms such as Twitter to disseminate information; however, the strategies that they should use to achieve high information diffusion are not clear. This article proposes message repetition as a strategy. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Research questions:</b> 1. What is the wear-out point of Twitter? 2. How many times should a company repeat a tweet written on its brand page to maximize the diffusion for seeds? 3. How many times should a company repeat a tweet written on its brand page to maximize the diffusion while minimizing the number of consumers reaching their wear-out point for seeds? 4. How many times should a company repeat a tweet written on its brand page to maximize the diffusion for nonseeds? 5. How many times should a company repeat a tweet written on its brand page to maximize the diffusion while minimizing the number of consumers reaching their wear-out point for both seeds and nonseeds? <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Research methodology:</b> An agent-based simulation model for information diffusion is proposed as an approach to measure the diffusion of a tweet that has been repeated. The model considers that consumers can reach their wear-out point when they read a tweet several times. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results:</b> The results of the model indicate the number of times a company should send the same tweet to achieve high information diffusion before this action has negative effects on consumers. Brand followers are key to achieving high information diffusion; however, consumers begin to feel bothered by the tweet by the sixth repetition. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusions:</b> To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine tweet repetition as a strategy to achieve higher information diffusion on Twitter. In addition, it extends the information diffusion literature by controlling the wear-out effect. It contributes to both communication and computational science literature by analyzing a communication problem using an agent-based approach. Finally, this article contributes to the field of technical and professional communication by testing a strategy to reach great information diffusion, and by creating a tool that any company can use to anticipate the results of a communication campaign created in Twitter before launching it.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2023-06-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2023.3260449
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (79) · 4 in this index

  1. Journal of Digital & Social Media Marketing
  2. 10.1080/01633392.1988.10504936
  3. Best practices in using Twitter for business
  4. 10.4324/9781315806099
  5. 10.1086/376800
Show all 79 →
  1. 10.4135/9781452229379
  2. 10.1080/00913367.2015.1018460
  3. Repetition, cognitive responses, and persuasion
    Cognitive Responses in Persuasion
  4. 10.3758/BF03212593
  5. Twitter CEO Dick Cistolo, Jack Dorsey interview
  6. Replies and retweets on Twitter
  7. 10.1007/s11747-014-0414-5
  8. 10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.003
  9. 10.1037/h0076165
  10. 10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408
  11. 10.1080/1369118X.2013.853817
  12. 10.1080/02650487.2015.1037708
  13. 10.1080/15252019.2015.1016636
  14. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  15. 10.1016/j.tele.2021.101623
  16. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.027
  17. 10.1177/2329488415572788
  18. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.008
  19. 10.1109/SocialCom.2010.33
  20. 10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14033
  21. 10.1016/j.bushor.2014.02.001
  22. 10.1109/HICSS.2010.412
  23. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.020
  24. 10.1007/s11573- 020-01022-9
  25. 10.31449/inf.v45i6.3575
  26. 10.1177/0165551514565318
  27. 10.1509/jm.74.2.71
  28. Company info
  29. 10.1509/jm.10.0088
  30. 10.1108/IntR-07-2016-0223
  31. 10.1007/s11747-014-0388-3
  32. 10.1080/00913367.2013.827606
  33. 10.1007/s42979-021-00836-w
  34. 10.1145/2872518.2889393
  35. 10.1145/2487788.2488110
  36. 10.1007/s12525-011-0065-z
  37. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.001
  38. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  39. 10.1111/jcc4.12074
  40. 10.1145/2187836.2187907
  41. 10.3390/info13010013
  42. 10.4135/9781412983327
  43. 10.1007/978-3-030-36525-7_9
  44. 10.1108/IMDS-07-2016-0290
  45. A system for real-time Twitter sentiment analysis of 2012 U.S. presidential election cycle
    Proc ACL Syst Demonstrations
  46. Should you repeat your tweets? Facts and figures from 1M tweets
  47. 10.1080/1206212X.2020.1758430
  48. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  49. 10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.022
  50. 10.1080/02650487.2016.1173765
  51. How small business are using social media
  52. 10.1080/10641734.1998.10505073
  53. How people use Twitter in general
  54. By the numbers a few amazing Twitter stats
  55. 10.1177/0047287520951639
  56. 10.1108/EJM-03-2017-0182
  57. 10.1509/jmr.15.0443
  58. Simulation of new service product diffusion on cellular automata
    China Market
  59. What's going on?: Challenges and opportunities for social media use in the writing classroom
    J Fac Dev
  60. Connecting programmatic research with social media: Using data from Twitter to inform pro…
    Programmatic Perspectives
  61. Grape/wine marketing with new media and return of the Boomer
    Practical Winery & Vineyard
  62. 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.04.002
  63. 10.1080/02650487.2016.1240469
  64. 10.2501/JAR-51-1-258-275
  65. 10.1509/jmr.11.0305
  66. Modeling the impact of consumer interactions in technology markets
    J Cellular Automata
  67. 10.1023/A:1011122126881
  68. Simulation of market diffusion of new product based on cellular automata
    Proc Glob Market Conf Market Dynamic Global World
  69. Teaching and learning with social media
    Programmatic Perspectives
  70. Technical Communication Quarterly
  71. 10.1108/OIR-02-2018-0065
  72. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.008
  73. 10.1007/978-3-642-02774-1_16
  74. 10.1007/s11129-015-9159-9