How Effectively Do We Communicate? An Analysis of Team Reflexivity in Transition and Action Phases of Team Collaboration

Kristin Weger; Sheri Leder; Bryan Mesmer; Vineetha Menon; Harald Schaub

doi:10.1109/tpc.2022.3186773

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Sep 2022

How Effectively Do We Communicate? An Analysis of Team Reflexivity in Transition and Action Phases of Team Collaboration

Kristin Weger University of Alabama in Huntsville ; Sheri Leder University of Alabama in Huntsville ; Bryan Mesmer University of Alabama in Huntsville ; Vineetha Menon University of Alabama in Huntsville ; Harald Schaub University of Bamberg

Abstract

Background: Communication is the backbone of effective collaboration, enabling project success; yet, engineering projects often fail due to poor communication. Specifically, engineering teams may benefit from reflexivity interventions to improve decision making, problem solving, innovation, and performance. In this study, we focus on team reflexivity in direct application to engineering project management to identify reflexivity processes that facilitate effective communication. Literature review: Although research has shown that team reflexivity interventions—elicited through communication—can improve team interaction and performance, little empirical evidence exists into the temporal dimensions across the action and transition phases of team reflexivity processes. Research questions: 1. How is team reflexivity expressed through text-based communication? 2. How and when do team members shift between reflexivity processes over time, especially across and between transition and action phases? Research methodology: We analyzed collaborative activity among 62 four-person teams in a computer-simulated microworld across two scenarios. The reflexivity processes exhibited during interaction were identified and analyzed using statistical and content analysis. Results and discussion: Analyses indicated that team reflection promoted discussions about key issues, facilitated frequent process shifts among transition and action phases, and resulted in overall better performance. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate the importance of team reflexivity interventions in engineering project teams to strategically guide members to improve planning, responding, and quality of attention devoted to long-term outcomes. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate the importance of deep structured team reflexivity through process shifts to help members understand strategies and goals, and develop shared objectives in complex environments.

Journal: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published: 2022-09-01
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2022.3186773
CompPile
Open Access: Closed
Topics: collaborative writing digital rhetoric
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Lang et al. (2023)

Computer-Assisted Corpus Analysis: An Introduction to Concepts, Processes, and …

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (61) · 3 in this index

10.1108/jwl-01-2015-0006

↗
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01730

↗
10.5465/amr.2001.4845785

↗
10.5465/annals.2017.0020

↗
10.1177/2329488415627273

↗

Show all 61 →

Thompson (2001)

Collaboration in technical communication: a qualitative content analysis of jou…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Behles (2013)

The use of online collaborative writing tools by technical communication practitioners an…

Tech. Commun.
10.1108/tpm-11-2021-0082

↗
10.3390/su13084381

↗
Pope-Ruark (2015)

Introducing Agile Project Management Strategies in Technical and Professional C…

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
10.1177/1046496498295003

↗
10.1177/154193120905300414

↗
10.1177/1046496414553473

↗
McGrath (1964)

Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction
10.1177/014920639702300303

↗
10.4236/jss.2018.612001

↗
West (2000)

Reflexivity, revolution, and innovation in work teams

Adv. Interdiscipl. Study Work Teams Product Develop. Teams
10.1177/1046496418804898

↗
Widmer (2009)

Recent developments in reflexivity research: A review

Psychol. Everyday Activity
10.1177/1046496410369563

↗
10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00250.x

↗
Drner (1997)

The Logic of Failure: Recognizing and Avoiding Error in Complex Situations
10.1080/15710880601170800

↗
10.1002/job.1784

↗
10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.10.003

↗
10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.002

↗
10.5465/amj.2011.61967991

↗
Cannon-Bowers (1995)

Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements
Fleishman (1992)

Toward a taxonomy of team performance functions
10.1177/1046496405277134

↗
10.1177/1046496413483326

↗
10.1037/a0037339

↗
10.1080/1359432x.2015.1005608

↗
10.1177/1046496408320048

↗
10.1177/0963721413504106

↗
Prince (1993)

Training and research for teamwork in the military aircrew
10.1177/0149206308316061

↗
10.1002/job.88

↗
10.1177/0149206313488210

↗
10.1016/0747-5632(93)90005-D

↗
10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467

↗
10.5465/amr.2005.16387885

↗
10.1108/eb028933

↗
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

↗
Palma et al. (2021)

Identifying Multidisciplinary Metrics to Analyze NASA Case Studies

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.1177/001316446002000104

↗
10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.005

↗
10.1177/1046496408317036

↗
10.4324/9780203805770-21

↗
10.1093/beheco/ark016

↗
10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28

↗
Drner (1978)

Self-reflection and problem solving
Drner (1999)

Bauplan Fr Eine Seele [A Blueprint of the Mind]
10.1002/acp.949

↗
10.1037//0033-2909.121.1.43

↗
10.1016/0030-5073(79)90001-1

↗
10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.11.003

↗
10.1109/ms.2014.54

↗
Badke-Schaub

Analyzing design work by critical situations: Identifying factors influencing teamwork in…
10.1080/01463370309370146

↗
10.1287/orsc.12.3.346.10098

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network → Build reading path →

How Effectively Do We Communicate? An Analysis of Team Reflexivity in Transition and Action Phases of Team Collaboration

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

References (61) · 3 in this index

Related Articles