Abstract
Transactions of the Royal Society, in London in 1665.This journal published papers shared at meetings and served as a permanent record of those contributions to knowledge.Peer review in those days was essentially the acceptance of a person's credentials for election to the Society.Since that time, and especially during the past 50 to 75 years, peer review has evolved into the process of double-anonymous vetting of manuscripts by expert reviewers that we take for granted today for the vast majority of technical and professional journals.In our own time, our own discipline, and our own journal, we rely on rigorous peer review to ensure that only the highest quality content in the field of professional communication appears in these pages.This process of peer review relies on the knowledge and the good graces of reviewers who undertake this important and time-consuming task with only the thanks of the editor and the TRANSACTIONS' readers as payment.
- Journal
- IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
- Published
- 2020-03-01
- DOI
- 10.1109/tpc.2020.2971040
- CompPile
- Open Access
- OA PDF Bronze
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026“Article laundry” or “tutor in pocket?”: Multilingual writers’ generative AI-assisted writing in professional settings ↗Qianqian Zhang-Wu
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly May 2026Rashid Ashraf; Said Badreddine; Mohamed I. Albeshr; Hamsa Al Ammari; Malik Muhammad Sheheryar Khan; Pranav Naithani
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly May 2026Joe Edward Hatfield
-
Written Communication May 2026Categorizing Human Identity in Writing Research: A Case for Participant Self-Identification in the Disaggregation of Data ↗Jennifer Burke Reifman
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Apr 2026Suo Yan Mei; Suo Yan Ju; Zarima Mohd Zakaria