IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Jun 2017

Is Enterprise Gamification Being Cannibalized by Its Own Brand?

Moataz M. Kamel ; Mohamed K. Watfa University of Wollongong in Dubai ; Brian Lobo University of Wollongong in Dubai ; Daniel Sobh University of Wollongong in Dubai

Abstract

Research problem: Gamification is a concept that originates from the digital media domain. It includes a process of enhancing a service using game design elements in nongame contexts. Although much research exists on gamification, very few studies focus on the application of gamification in the enterprise. Research questions: (1) How do managers currently use and experience gamification as a communication medium? (2) Why is it that few instances of gamification exist in enterprise management? (3) Is gamification's own branding somehow cannibalizing itself in enterprise applications? Literature review: We reviewed gamification literature in the workplace and looked at the applicability of game design elements within the enterprise culture. Enterprise gamification is still considered uncharted territory, and more research on gamification in the enterprise is needed. But existing research studies support our claims that there is high potential for enterprise gamification that needs to be explored. Methodology: Observations were made during fieldwork with an exploratory interview research approach. These observations were put to test via an online psychological single-blind controlled quantitative experiment conducted with 198 survey respondents to investigate the effect of branding on gamification and its perception in the enterprise context. Results and conclusions: The results show that using the “gamification” brand clearly drives lower rates of perceived acceptance of the concept, whereas using an “unbranded” version of the same gamification concepts results in comparatively higher rates of perceived acceptance and a general willingness to adopt within the enterprise context. The results also confirm that “interest” and “branding” are interrelated, and that gamification faces higher rates of resistance, lower rates of adoption, and lower success rates in the enterprise compared to other fields. Thus, enterprise gamification may not be correctly branded, and our research recommends the use of a set of procedural, prepackaged best practices, in the form of an implementation framework, to guarantee optimal design and implementation.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2017-06-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2017.2656598
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
disability studies book reviews
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (18)

  1. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00014
     ↗
  2. hay (2014)
    Data governance gamification
    Business Intelligence Journal
  3. 10.1007/978-3-642-30439-2_35
     ↗
  4. 10.1386/jgvw.6.2.129_1
     ↗
  5. 10.1080/10511970.2012.736451
     ↗
Show all 18 →
  1. (2013)
    Social business transformation through gamification
    Int J Inf Tech Manage
  2. meloni (2012)
    Gamification in 2012: Market update, consumer and enterprise market trends
  3. zichermann (2011)
    Gamification by Design Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps
  4. korolov (2012)
    Gamification of the enterprise: How to successfully add game features to corporate processes
  5. mcallister (2004)
    Game Work Language Power and Computer Game Culture
  6. 10.1177/0266382114538350
     ↗
  7. pettey (0)
    Gartner's 2012 Hype Cycle for emerging technologies identifies tipping point technologies…
  8. thiebes (0)
    Gamifying information systems: A synthesis of gamification mechanics and dynamics
    Proc 22nd Eur Conf Inf Syst
  9. 10.1386/jgvw.6.2.159_1
     ↗
  10. 10.1109/ICSEM.2012.27
     ↗
  11. 10.1145/2393132.2393137
     ↗
  12. deterding (0)
    From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining ‘gamification’
    Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference Envisioning Future Media Environments ACM
  13. o'donnell (2014)
    Getting played: Gamification, bullshit, and the rise of algorithmic surveillance
    Surveillance and Society  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Communication Design Quarterly Jun 2025
    Review of "Fitter, Happier: The Eugenic Strain in Twentieth-Century Cancer Rhetoric by Lois Peters Agnew," Agnew, L. P. (2024). Fitter, Happier: The Eugenic Strain in Twentieth-Century Cancer Rhetoric. The University of Alabama Press. ↗
    M. L. Andrews
    rhetorical criticism disability studies book reviews
  2. Pedagogy Oct 2023
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy writing across the curriculum two-year college teacher development collaborative writing assessment writing centers qualitative research multimodality literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies affect and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter
  3. Pedagogy Jan 2023
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism first-year composition writing pedagogy writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development writing program administration writing centers digital rhetoric literacy studies gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric literary studies book reviews editorial matter
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Dec 2022
    Assembling Critical Components: A Framework for Sustaining Technical and Professional Communication: Joanna Schreiber and Lisa Melonçon: [Book Review] ↗
    Varun Gupta; Chetna Gupta
    rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis professional writing disability studies book reviews
  5. Journal of Response to Writing Dec 2022
    Review of The Hidden Inequities in Labor-Based Contract Grading, by Ellen C. Carillo, Current Arguments in Composition, 2021 ↗
    Sladek, Amanda
    disability studies book reviews