Opposing Broad Patent: Scientific American's Response to Morse v. O'Reilly (1848)

Norman E. Youngblood

doi:10.1109/tpc.2010.2099810

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2011

Opposing Broad Patent: Scientific American's Response to Morse v. O'Reilly (1848)

Norman E. Youngblood

Abstract

In 1848, <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">{\font \frog = psabkml \hbox {\frog Scientific American}</tex></formula> , a popular science and technology journal, published a series criticizing Morse v. O'Reilly's (1848) confirmation of Samuel Morse's broad telegraph patent and patenting scientific principles. It attacked the decision using copia and classification, rhetoric echoed by the Supreme Court and others in reversing the 1848 decision. The journal was particularly concerned with the case's implications for Morse's patent battles with Royal House and Alexander Bain. The articles offer an opportunity to examine the rhetoric of patent debates and differences in the rhetoric of professional and scientific journals without the emotional attachments of examining contemporary issues.

Journal: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published: 2011-03-01
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2010.2099810
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: rhetorical criticism editorial matter
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (5)

Malone (2007)

Historical Studies of Technical Communication in the United States and England:…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Johnson (2006)

Prediscursive Technical Communication in the Early American Iron Industry

Technical Communication Quarterly
Todd (2003)

Teaching the History of Technical Communication: A Lesson with Franklin and Hoover

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
MILLER (1998)

Learning from History

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Brockmann (1988)

Does Clio Have a Place in Technical Writing? Considering Patents in a History o…

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Also cites 13 works outside this index ↓

10.1038/scientificamerican12021848-83

↗
10.1038/scientificamerican11251848-75

↗
10.1038/scientificamerican10211848-35

↗
10.4135/9781452233222

↗
10.1038/scientificamerican11111848-59

↗
10.1038/scientificamerican11041848-51

↗
10.1038/scientificamerican10281848-43

↗
10.1038/scientificamerican12021848-83a

↗
10.1126/science.1135872

↗
10.1038/scientificamerican10141848-29

↗
10.1017/S002205070000663X

↗
10.2307/3104082

↗
10.1038/scientificamerican12091848-91

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Opposing Broad Patent: Scientific American's Response to Morse v. O'Reilly (1848)

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

Cites in this index (5)

Related Articles