Employee Reactions to Paper and Electronic Surveys: An Experimental Comparison

Anne-Marie Croteau ; Linda Dyer Concordia University ; Marco Miguel

Abstract

Using a within-subjects field experiment, we tested the differences between paper-based and electronic employee surveys. Employees of a large organization were invited to respond to a paper survey as well as an identical electronic survey. Results from 134 employees who completed both questionnaires indicated that electronic surveys were seen as marginally easier to use and more enjoyable than paper surveys. However, the paper-based questionnaires produced a higher response rate. The self-reported likelihood that participants would respond to similar questionnaires in the future did not differ between the two formats. After comparing the answers on survey items that measured feelings of well-being and spending patterns, data quality also appeared to be equivalent across the two formats. Conceptual issues, as well as the implications for managers who are administering employee surveys, are discussed.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2010-09-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2010.2052852
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (2)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Also cites 27 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.4018/joeuc.2005100103
  2. 10.1002/ir.97
  3. 10.1093/poq/nfm038
  4. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
  5. 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  6. 10.1080/02664769922322
  7. 10.1108/09670730710820127
  8. 10.1093/poq/nfi053
  9. 10.1207/S15327590IJHC1602_04
  10. 10.1108/09513550110390846
  11. 10.1177/089443939901700402
  12. Usability evaluation of computer-assisted survey instruments
    Social Sci Comput Rev  
  13. 10.2307/255867
  14. 10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00004-9
  15. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00259.x
  16. 10.1177/1094428106/294696
  17. 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  18. 10.2307/249008
  19. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01591.x
  20. 10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
  21. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00149.x
  22. 10.1086/268992
  23. 10.1086/297851
  24. 10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93
  25. 10.1177/1094428106287434
  26. comparing the response rate, response speed, and response quality of two methods of sendi…
    J Market Res Soc  
  27. 10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00071-7