-
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
-
10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
-
10.1080/02664769922322
-
10.1108/09670730710820127
-
10.1093/poq/nfi053
-
10.1207/S15327590IJHC1602_04
-
10.1108/09513550110390846
-
10.1177/089443939901700402
-
couper (2000)
Usability evaluation of computer-assisted survey instruments
-
10.2307/255867
-
10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00004-9
-
cobanoglu (2001)
a comparison of mail, fax and web-based survey methods
International Journal of Research in Marketing
-
10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00259.x
-
10.1177/1094428106/294696
-
bachmann (1996)
tracking the progress of e-mail vs. snail-mail
J Marketing Res
-
dommeyer (2000)
comparing two forms of an e-mail survey: embedded vs. attached
International Journal of Research in Marketing
-
10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
-
lilienthal (2002)
if you give your employees a voice, do you listen
J Qual Particip
-
10.2307/249008
-
10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01591.x
-
Downing et al. (2007)
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
-
10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
-
mcconnell (2003)
How to Design Implement and Interpret an Employee Survey
-
thomas (2004)
emap communications talks to staff online
The International of Human Resource Management
-
goudge (2007)
issues to consider for your online survey
Strateg Commun Manage
-
kraut (1996)
Organizational Surveys
-
10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00149.x
-
smith (2003)
Organizational Surveys The Diagnosis and Betterment of Organizations Through Their Members
-
10.1086/268992
-
weible (1998)
The impact of the internet on data collection
J Marketing Res
-
10.1086/297851
-
10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93
-
10.1177/1094428106287434
-
tse (1998)
comparing the response rate, response speed, and response quality of two methods of sendi…
-
10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00071-7