Abstract

This study explores methodological issues that communication scholars and practitioners face when administering electronic surveys within for-profit organizations. In 2000, the researchers conducted a series of three cross-sectional studies within General Electric's (GE) Global Research Center. The Center is located in Niskayuna, NY. An equivalent version of a communication survey was administered electronically to a random stratified sample of GE employees three times that year. Each employee sample was subject to a different survey intervention: no intervention, follow-up reminder email only, and leader pre-announcement email plus a follow-up reminder. The researchers also recorded how long it took respondents to return their surveys. The highest response rate (41%) occurred in the third intervention. Across the three administrations, 465 GE employees completed the surveys; 98% of respondents returned their surveys electronically rather than printing out their responses and sending them to the researcher by postal mail. The article concludes with implications and suggestions for those who administer electronic surveys within organizations.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2007-09-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2007.902826
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (38) · 2 in this index

  1. the one number you need to grow
    Harvard Bus Rev
  2. 10.1086/317761
  3. SPSS X Advanced Statistics Guide
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. StatXact 4 for Windows User's Manual
Show all 38 →
  1. watch what you put in that office e-mail
    Bus Week
  2. doing survey research on the internet: yes, timing does matter
    J Comput Inf Syst
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. e-marketers look to polish spam's rusty image
    Wall Str J
  5. the impact of the internet on data collection
    Marketing Res
  6. Survey Research Methods
  7. 10.1086/318641
  8. faqs on online research
    Marketing Res
  9. comparing two forms of an e-mail survey: embedded vs. attached
    Int J Res Marketing
  10. 10.1177/109442810031004
  11. are internet panels creating professional respondents?
    Marketing Res
  12. sampling for internet surveys: an examination of respondent selection for internet research
    J Market Res Soc  
  13. market research: a matter of opinion
    Wall Str J
  14. you have mail (actually, you have way too much junk mail)
    Wall Str J
  15. Measurement Design and Analysis An Integrated Approach
  16. Handbook of Online Marketing Research
  17. 10.2307/258340
  18. 10.2307/255867
  19. e-mail and snail-mail face off in research
    Marketing Res
  20. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
  21. tracking the progress of e-mail versus snail-mail
    Marketing Res
  22. 10.1086/297851
  23. 10.1086/268992
  24. collecting survey data on-line: problems and propositions
    Conf National Communication Assoc
  25. technical writers turn to web surveys
    InterCom
  26. 10.1177/0893318902153007
  27. (2001). e-mail survey response rates: a review.
    J Comput -Mediated Commun
  28. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00259.x
  29. 10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80055-5
  30. comparing the response rate, response speed and response quality of two methods of sendin…
    J Market Res Soc  
  31. electronic mail vs. mail survey response rates
    Marketing Res
  32. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  33. collecting data the e-mail way
    Training and Devel